Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2009 Oct 1;18(5):594–605. doi: 10.1007/s10826-009-9262-1

Table 3.

Bivariate Correlations among Parents’ and Children’s Religiosity for Maltreated and Nonmaltreated Boys and Girls

Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6
Nonmaltreated (N = 159 dyads; 69 boys and 90 girls)
1. Children’s Church Attendance .05 .55* .36* −.10 −.03
2. Children’s Importance of Faith .18 .04 −.03 .13 .04
3. Parents’ Church Attendance .51* .12 .69* −.19+ .10
4. Parents’ Importance of Faith .30* .22+ .67* −.16 .13
5. Child Internalizing Symptomatology −.13 .11 −.12 .14 −.02
6. Child Externalizing Symptomatology −.25* −.15 −.23+ −.33* .47*
Maltreated (N = 170 dyads; 99 boys and 71 girls)
1. Children’s Church Attendance .07 .32* .11 −.13 .13
2. Children’s Importance of Faith .29* .03 .18 −.27* −.08
3. Parents’ Church Attendance .17+ .18+ .66* −.06 −.03
4. Parents’ Importance of Faith .13 .12 .66* .05 −.02
5. Child Internalizing Symptomatology .14 −.06 .07 .08 .11
6. Child Externalizing Symptomatology .02 .06 −.20* −.10 .05

Note. Correlations of boys are below the diagonal and correlations of girls are above the diagonal.

*

p < .05;

+

p < .10.