Skip to main content
. 1998 Sep 1;95(18):10710–10715. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10710

Table 1.

Neural networks trained to recognize promoters of the 17-base-spacing class

Network Index Index coding/levels Prototype No. test promoters >cutoff Sequence
NW1 (14.5) RI ∗ BvH Fine/11, 4 41 promoters 1× permuted  (5,412 seq) > 0.93 (28/34) pBR >0.93 1, 4,135 pBR(c) >0.93 125, 1,2264,278
NW2 (26) RI ∗ BvH Coarse/6, 4 41 promoters  (41 seq) >0.985 (28/34) pBR >0.985 1, 4,135 pBR(c) >0.985 21, 125, 1226, 4278
NW3 (21) RI ∗ BvH Coarse/6, 4 41 promoters  (41 seq) >0.96 (29/34) pBR >0.96 1, 4135 pBR(c) >0.96 21, 125, 1226, 4278
NW4 (192) RI ∗ (RI+ − RI) Fine/10, 0 41 promoters  (41 seq) >0.80 (29/34) pBR >0.80 1, 4135 pBR(c) >0.80 125, 532, 1056, 1226, 4278
NW5 (41.4) RI ∗ (RI+ − RI) Coarse/6,4 41 promoters  (41 seq) >0.77 (30/34) pBR >0.77 1, 170, 3654, 4135 pBR(c) >0.77 125, 1056, 1226, 4278
  Average result 29/34 1, 4135
85% TP 125, 1226, 4278, 1FP

Numbers listed after the network in parentheses are the training iterations in thousands. NW3 had 15 middle-layer neurons; all others had 8. Learning rates and momentum values of the following networks: NW1, 0.5 and 0.2; NW2, 0.9 and 0.4; NW3, 0.6 and 0.4; NW4, 0.15 and 0.1; NW5, 0.6 and 0.4. Input neurons varied from 348 to 352. NW3 was tested on the first and last 16.4 kb of the λ r strand (the B region was omitted to avoid its many uncharted promoter sites) with performance virtually identical to that above for pBR322, 100% true positives (TP) and 0.024% false positives (FP). Underlined coordinants indicate known promoters. 

pBR is the clockwise sequence of pBR322, beginning at position −5 to capture the tet promoter; pBR322(c) is the counterclockwise sequence beginning at the EcoRI site. The cutoff values for the minimum network output designating a promoter are listed for each network.