Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Res. 2009 Dec;66(6):693–697. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181bbce86

The Genetic Susceptibility to Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Orly Levit 1, Yuan Jiang 1, Matthew J Bizzarro 1, Naveed Hussain 1, Catalin S Buhimschi 1, Jeffrey R Gruen 1, Heping Zhang 1, Vineet Bhandari 1
PMCID: PMC2796284  NIHMSID: NIHMS149426  PMID: 19687775

Abstract

Previous studies to identify a genetic component to respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) have shown conflicting results. Our objectives were to evaluate and quantify the genetic contribution to RDS using data that comprehensively includes known environmental factors in a large sample of premature twins. Data from a retrospective chart review of twins born at ≤32 weeks gestational age were obtained from 2 neonatal units. Mixed effects logistic regression (MELR) analysis was used to assess the influence of several independent covariates on RDS. A zygosity analysis, including the effects of additive genetic and common and residual environmental (ACE) factors, was performed to estimate the genetic contribution. Results reveal that the 332 twin pairs had a mean gestational age of 29.5 weeks and birth weight of 1372 grams. MELR identified significant non-genetic covariates as male gender (p=0.04), birth weight (p<0.001), 5-minute Apgar score (p<0.001) and treating institution (p=0.001) as significant predictors for RDS. The ACE model was employed to estimate the genetic susceptibility to RDS by adjusting for the above factors. We found 49.7% (p=0.04) of the variance in liability to RDS was the result of genetic factors alone. We conclude that there is a significant genetic susceptibility to RDS in preterm infants.


Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a disease process that results from an absent or diminished amount of surfactant in the newborn lung. Prematurity, therefore, plays a crucial role in the development of RDS. The incidence is inversely proportional to gestational age (GA) and birth weight (BW), with approximately 71% of neonates with BW between 501 and 750 grams affected as compared with 23% of those between 1250 and 1500 grams (1). In addition to prematurity, multiple additional factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of RDS. These include maternal, intrapartum, and neonatal variables such as advanced maternal age (2), chorioamnionitis (3,4), mode of delivery (5), gender(6,7), and birth order (8-11). Despite major advances, such as increased use of prenatal steroids and postnatal surfactant in perinatal and neonatal care, RDS is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants and incurs an estimated annual economic burden of 2.3 billion dollars (12-14).

In preterm infants of the same GA, the clinical severity of RDS varies widely. We hypothesized therefore that, in addition to environmental effects, unknown genetic factors play a major role in predisposing premature neonates to RDS.

Our major objective was to conduct a heritability study of a large cohort of premature twin pairs, using sophisticated statistical analyses that control for the major known independent risk factors, to identify and quantify the genetic contribution to RDS.

Methods

Subjects

Data on premature twins born at ≤32 weeks of gestation between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2004, including zygosity information were collected from 2 centers (The University of Connecticut and Yale University). We included only infants who survived beyond a postmenstrual age (PMA) of 36 weeks. The twin database was created to evaluate the genetic contribution to common neonatal disorders (including bronchopulmonary dysplasia). In addition, we wanted to avoid missing the diagnosis of RDS, especially if death occurred early (for example, in the delivery room), and prevented the clinical picture and/or radiographic manifestations to be overtly manifested. Hence, for consistency, we excluded all deaths prior to 36 weeks PMA. The institutional review boards of both centers approved this study and exempted it from obtaining informed consent, as per their guidelines.

Definitions

Data was prospectively collected and entered into the databases by trained research personnel at both institutions, as routine practice, using similar definitions. RDS was defined as presence of respiratory distress with an oxygen requirement to maintain oxygen saturations of ≥ 90% in the first 6 hours of life, accompanied by a characteristic chest radiograph. The time frame was selected to allow inclusion of the maximum number of cases of primary/congenital RDS and to avoid cases of acquired RDS. The chest X-ray was used for confirmation of diagnosis by excluding other potential causes of respiratory distress for example, transient tachypnea of the newborn. All radiographs were routinely read by trained pediatric radiologists at both institutions. Zygosity was determined by ultrasound evaluation prior to 20 weeks GA and histopathological examination of the placenta at Yale and the University of Connecticut with an additional confirmation of the gender. Gestational hypertension was defined as any new onset blood pressure >140/90 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure >105 mmHg that occurred after the 20th week of pregnancy. In vitro fertilization (IVF) was defined as any type of assisted reproductive technology that involved extracorporeal fertilization. Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) was defined as rupture that occurred at least 18 hours prior to delivery. Histological chorioamnionitis was defined by pathological examination of the placenta (15).

Statistical Analysis

Demographic data were analyzed using Student's t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, or chi-square analysis when appropriate. For chi-square analysis of the zygosity data, the observed numbers of twin pairs with both infants affected, with only one infant affected and with neither infant affected were found respectively for monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) groups. These observed numbers formed a 2×3 contingency table. On the other hand, the analog expected numbers of twin pairs were calculated from the corresponding marginal totals. The observed to expected distributions of concordance were compared using chi-square analysis.

Mixed effect logistic regression (MELR) analysis was performed to identify the impact of putative factors on RDS. The covariates utilized in the model included maternal age, IVF, delivery type, birth order, gender, weight, 5-minute Apgar score and treating institution. The status of the outcomes from twin pairs was treated as a correlated event. A MELR model was fitted to assess the relationship between the covariates listed and the outcome of interest (RDS), and to incorporate the correlation between twin pairs.

The additive genetic, common environmental and residual effects (ACE) model (16) was then used to estimate the variance in liability for RDS. The ACE model is a mixed effects probit model, which included covariate effects, an additive genetic effect, a common environmental effect shared by a twin pair (with no distinction between MZ and DZ twin pairs), and a residual environmental effect. The additive genetic effects, the common environmental effect, and the residual environmental effects were assumed to be independently and normally distributed. The additive genetic effects for MZ twins were assumed to be identical. For DZ twins, the covariance of the additive genetic effects was assumed to be half that of MZ twins (17). The covariates adjusted in the ACE model included all significant covariates utilized in the MELR analysis. The genetic heritability could then be estimated using the ratio of estimated genetic variance and the total variance of the trait.

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.1(PROC NLMIXED). A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The cohort consisted of 332 twin pairs with a mean GA of 29.5 weeks and BW of 1372 grams. There were 70 MZ twin pairs and 262 DZ twin pairs. RDS was diagnosed in 465 of 664 (70.0%) infants. Despite a discrepancy in the overall number of twins pairs in each group, no statistically significant differences were observed between MZ and DZ twins with respect to gender, GA, weight, 5-minute Apgar score, maternal race, delivery type, the incidences of gestational hypertension, PROM, maternal diabetes, and chorioamnionitis, and the use of antenatal steroids and antibiotics (Table 1). However, significant differences were found between MZ and DZ twins with respect to maternal age and the proportion of neonates conceived via IVF (Table 1). The distribution of patients with RDS by site and BW are shown in Table 2.

Table 1.

Comparison of demographic data for monozygous (MZ) and dizygous (DZ) twins.

MZ (n=140) DZ (n=524) p value

Maternal age* (years) 29.01 ± 6.11 31.30 ± 6.36 0.007

Maternal Race (n, %) 0.750
Caucasian 50 (71.4) 188 (71.8)
African-American 13 (18.6) 53 (20.2)
Hispanic 1 (1.4) 7 (2.7)
Asian 1 (1.4) 1 (0.4)
Others 5 (7.1) 13 (5.0)

Gestational hypertension (n, %) 15 (10.7) 80 (15.3) 0.218

PROM (n, %) 17 (12.1) 73 (13.9) 0.682

Chorioamnionitis (n, %) 9 (6.4) 37 (7.1) 0.941

Diabetes Mellitus (n, %) 6 (4.3) 43 (8.2) 0.163

Antenatal Steroids (n, %) 85 (60.7) 279 (53.2) 0.138

Antibiotics (n, %) 40 (28.6) 182 (34.7) 0.203

IVF (n, %) 4 (2.9) 95 (18.2) <0.001

Delivery type vaginal (n, %) 37 (26.6) 156 (29.8) 0.534

Male gender (n, %) 72 (51.4) 283 (54.0) 0.654

GA* (weeks) 29.7 ± 2.2 29.5 ± 2.5 0.252

BW* (grams) 1338 ± 410 1382 ± 466 0.284

Apgar <7 at 5 minutes (n, %) 15 (10.7) 49 (9.4) 0.756

RDS (n, %) 100 (71.4) 365 (69.7) 0.762
*

Mean + SD.

Table 2.

The incidence of RDS by birth weight and site

Birth Weight (grams) UCONN (n= 333) Yale (n= 330) p value
<1000 81/86 (94.2) * 70/72 (97.2) * 0.592
1000 -1249 40/53 (75.5) * 53/69 (76.8) * 1.000
1250-1999 86/171 (50.3) * 111/163 (68.1) * 0.001
≥ 2000 9/23 (39.1) * 15/26 (57.7) * 0.312
*

n, (%)

We initially performed an unadjusted concordance analysis to look for a genetic effect for RDS. The analysis revealed a significant difference of concordance distributions between MZ and DZ twin pairs (p=0.02), suggesting a significant role for genetic factors in the pathogenesis of RDS (Table 3).

Table 3.

Zygosity analysis.

Twin pairs Both have RDS One has RDS Neither has RDS Total p value

MZ 44 (38.4)* 12 (21.3) 14 (10.3) 70 0.02
DZ 138 (144) 89 (79.7) 35 (38.7) 262

Total 182 101 49 332
*

Observed number of twin pairs (expected number of twin pairs). Expected number 38.4 calculated as 182×70/332.

MELR analysis was next performed using RDS as the dependent variable to identify significant non-genetic covariates that may have contributed to the outcome of interest. The analysis determined that male gender (regression coefficient = 0.401; 95% CI: [0.019, 0.783]; p= 0.04), BW (regression coefficient = -0.002; 95% CI: [-0.002, -0.001]; p<0.001), 5-minute Apgar score (regression coefficient= -0.552; 95% CI: [-0.782, -0.322]; p<0.001), and institution (Yale; regression coefficient= 0.688; 95% CI: [0.284,1.091]; p= 0.001) were significant covariates for RDS (Table 4). Addition of race as a factor in the logistic regression model did not change our results in a significant manner (data not shown).

Table 4.

Mixed effects logistic regression analysis for RDS

Coefficient 95% CI p value
Birth Order (B) 0.180 [-0.198, 0.558] 0.350
Male Gender 0.401 [0.019, 0.783] 0.040
BW -0.002 [-0.002, -0.001] <0.001
Apgar -0.552 [-0.782, -0.322] <0.001
Institution (Yale) 0.688 [0.284, 1.091] 0.001
Mother's Age -0.013 [-0.045, 0.018] 0.409
Delivery Type (Vaginal) -0.291 [-0.718, 0.137] 0.182
IVF -0.309 [-0.831, 0.214] 0.246

Abbreviations as in the text.

After adjusting for all significant covariates identified by the MELR, total genetic effects accounted for 49.7% (p=0.04) of the variance in liability to RDS by ACE modeling.

Discussion

In 2 cohort studies of women who delivered two singleton preterm infants, a comparison of the relative risk of RDS in the second infant was done according to the RDS status of the first one (18). There was a significantly increased relative risk of RDS in the second sibling of women whose first preterm infant had RDS versus those whose first preterm infants did not have RDS. This remained significant even after controlling for confounding variables, suggesting an important genetic (or other familial) contribution to the risk of RDS (18).

Previous twin studies (10,19-21) have evaluated the genetic contribution to RDS with contradictory results. The first 2 studies published in 1971 (19) and 2002 (20), showed that RDS had a significant genetic component. Myrianthopoulos et al studied 31 twin pairs and showed a higher concordance rate between MZ compared to DZ pairs (85% concordance in MZ and 44% in DZ). In a retrospective review of all twins born during a 19-year period (1976 to 1995) in Amsterdam, van Sonderen et al found a RDS concordance rate of 67% when the twins were MZ as compared with only 29% when they were DZ (20). The Amsterdam study suggested a strong genetic influence, but only included 80 pairs with a GA of 30-34 weeks (20), a population with a fairly low risk for RDS.

In contrast, Marttila et al (21), evaluated 100 same-gender twin pairs with RDS and found a concordance difference of only 10% [95% CI: -0.1 to +0.3, p=0.32], suggesting an insignificant genetic contribution. The authors' concluded that the small concordance difference did not rule out the possibility of a genetic component of RDS (21). The same group of investigators then conducted a registry-based study that assessed the intrapair differences in susceptibility to RDS in a homogenous population of European ancestry (10). They concluded that environmental factors predominate over genetic factors based on a lack of concordance difference between same-gender twins compared with opposite-gender twins. While this study included a large number of twin pairs, the zygosity was inferred by considering all the gender discordant pairs as DZ and then estimating the number of MZ twin pairs from the gender concordant cohort (10).

A summary of the previous twin studies on the heritability of RDS and a comparison to the present one has been shown in Table 5. Interpretation of the results of previous studies were limited by sample size, variability in the methods for confirmation of zygosity and the exclusion of confounding variables known to contribute to the risk of RDS. Using a large sample size, a standard method for ascertaining zygosity, and including and controlling for virtually all major known non-genetic (i.e. environmental) risk factors for RDS, we were able to establish that a significant genetic contribution to RDS exists. Furthermore, we were able to quantify this contribution.

Table 5.

Comparison of twin studies evaluating the genetic contribution to RDS.

Number of twin pairs in study Determination of zygosity Genetic effect Remarks References
31 Based on gender, blood group, placental exam Yes Comparison of concordance MZ-DZ 19
80 Placental exam gender discordance Yes Comparison of concordance MZ-DZ 20
100 Multiple gene markers No Comparison of concordance MZ-DZ 21
638 MZ calculation No Comparison of concordance MZ-DZ 10
332 Placental exam, gender Yes Comparison of concordance MZ-DZ
MELR and ACE model
Present study

Despite lacking evidence for a definitive genetic contribution to RDS, investigators have attempted to identify specific genes that may contribute to its risk. The studies of SP-A and SP-B genes associated with RDS have been summarized in Table 6. Logistic regression analysis was used to test whether SP-C alleles coding for 138 Asn or 186 Asn explained the risk of RDS when gender was included in the analysis as a confounding factor. It was found that both alleles were independent risk factors for RDS (22). Recently, a variant of the SP-D gene (rs1923537) was associated with a lower prevalence of RDS (23). Another case-control study has suggested an association of G protein-coupled receptor for asthma susceptibility (GPR154 or GPRA) and neonatal RDS (24).

Table 6.

Surfactant protein gene allelic variants associated with risk for RDS.

Total number of infants in study SP-A SP-B Population Effect on RDS References
241 SP-A2 1A0/1A0 SP-B intron 4 polymorphism White population>28 weeks Increased risk 30
241 SP-A2 1A1/1 A1 SP-B intron 4 polymorphism White population>28 weeks Decreased risk 30
176 SP-A1 allele 6A2 Finnish population Increased risk 31
176 SP-A allele 6A3 Finnish population Decreased risk 31
684 SP-B Ile131 Thr Finnish population twins Determines the SP-A allele effect on RDS 32
White 511; Black 73 SP-A1 (6A2/6A2) SP-A2 (1A°/1A° or 1A°/* SP-B (9306 A/G or del/* White population Increased risk 33
White 511; Black 73 SP-A1 (6A3/6A3 or 6A3/*) SP-B (1580 T/T) Black population Reduced risk 33
White 511; Black n= 73 SP-B intron 4 del variant 33
White 511; Black 73 SP-B intron 4 ins variant Black females Increased risk 33
Parent-offspring trios 107 SP-A1-A2 haplotype 6A2-1A° Caucasian Finnish population Increased risk 34
Parent-offspring trios 107 SP-A1 6A3-1A1 6A4-1A5 Caucasian Finish population Decreased risk 34
198 SP-B intron 4 polymorphism Caucasian German population Increased risk 35
Singletons 441; Twins or multiples 480) SP-A1 6A2/6A2 SP-B exon 4 genotype Thr/Thr Caucasian Finnish population Increased risk 36
Singletons 441; Twins or multiples 480 SP-A 6A2 SP-B Ile/Thr Caucasian Finnish population Decreased risk 36
132 families SP-D/SP-A2 haplotype DA160-A/SP-A2 1A1 Also DA11-T present in SP-A containing haplotypes Mixed population Reduced risk 37

To the extent that some of these candidate-gene studies show significance for various alleles, polymorphisms, and haplotypes, does not address the central question: to what extent is RDS a genetic disease? Knowing this will determine whether further studies are justified to identify the genes that comprise the additive genetic effect in the ACE modeling, to identify genetic modifiers encoded in chromosomes, or to identify epigenetic modifiers, with the ultimate goal of informing rationale drug design. While surfactant-B deficiency is a validated autosomal dominant lethal form of lung disease (25), it is rare and does not significantly contribute to the common forms of RDS encountered by neonatologists daily; nor does it necessarily follow that since surfactant proteins are encoded in chromosomal DNA, that RDS is therefore genetic.

The data reported in the present study are first to quantify the genetic component to RDS. The strengths of our study include a large number of twins from a very heterogeneous population, and data on a large number of known confounding variables, including fertility treatment, prenatal steroids and maternal information related to pregnancy-specific conditions.

There are some limitations to our study. The zygosity was determined using ultrasound, placental histopathology, and gender, instead of DNA confirmation. A monochorionic placenta was regarded as representing MZ twins. Approximately 9% of similar gender dichorionic placentas are MZ (26). The results were not affected when adjustments were made for these worst-case scenarios. We included most of the known potential contributing factors, but there may be other factors that could affect the outcome of RDS. We did attempt to control for these unknown variables in our statistical model.

Twin studies are a powerful non-DNA based approach to determining the amount of the variance contributed by total genetic effects. These analyses are conditioned by the assumption that MZ twins share 100% of their chromosomal DNA and that DZ twins share, on average, 50%. The heritability of ∼50% for RDS is significant and comparable to that of other medical conditions, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (27,28) and retinopathy of prematurity (29). While epigenetics and other modifications to chromosomal DNA may suggest that these assumptions should slightly be adjusted, non-DNA based twin heritability studies remain robust.

We conclude that there is a strong genetic susceptibility to the development of RDS in preterm infants. This should act as a further impetus to spur the identification of the genetic elements of this condition, which, in turn, has the potential to make a significant impact on neonatal outcomes.

Acknowledgments

Financial Support: OL was supported in part by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Training Grant T32 HD 07094. JRG was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke R01 NS43530. HZ and YJ were supported in part by National Institute on Drug Abuse K02DA017713 and R01DA016750. VB was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute K08 HL 074195.

Abbreviations

ACE

additive genetic, common environmental and residual effects

BW

birth weight

DZ

dizygotic

GA

gestational age

IVF

in vitro fertilization

MELR

mixed effects logistic regression

MZ

monozygotic

RDS

respiratory distress syndrome

SP

surfactant proteins

Footnotes

Presented as a poster at the Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting at Baltimore, MD, May 2-5, 2009.

References

  • 1.Fanaroff AA, Stoll BJ, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, Stark AR, Bauer CR, Donovan EF, Korones SB, Laptook AR, Lemons JA, Oh W, Papile LA, Shankaran S, Stevenson DK, Tyson JE, Poole WK. Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:147.e141–e148. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dani C, Reali MF, Bertini G, Wiechmann L, Spagnolo A, Tangucci M, Rubaltelli FF. Risk factors for the development of respiratory distress syndrome and transient tachypnoea in newborn infants. Italian Group of Neonatal Pneumology. Eur Respir J. 1999;14:155–159. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14a26.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dempsey E, Chen MF, Kokottis T, Vallerand D, Usher R. Outcome of neonates less than 30 weeks gestation with histologic chorioamnionitis. Am J Perinatol. 2005;22:155–159. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Namavar Jahromi B, Ardekany MS, Poorarian S. Relationship between duration of preterm premature rupture of membranes and pulmonary maturation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;68:119–122. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(99)00194-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ziadeh SM, Sunna E, Badria LF. The effect of mode of delivery on neonatal outcome of twins with birthweight under 1500 grams. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;20:389–391. doi: 10.1080/01443610050112039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Klein JM, Nielsen HC. Androgen regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor binding activity during fetal rabbit lung development. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:425–431. doi: 10.1172/JCI116218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Luerti M, Parazzini F, Agarossi A, Bianchi C, Rocchetti M, Bevilacqua G. Risk factors for respiratory distress syndrome in the newborn. A multicenter Italian survey. Study Group for Lung Maturity of the Italian Society of Perinatal Medicine. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72:359–364. doi: 10.3109/00016349309021113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hacking D, Watkins A, Fraser S, Wolfe R, Nolan T. Respiratory distress syndrome and birth order in premature twins. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001;84:F117–F121. doi: 10.1136/fn.84.2.F117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Balchin I, Whittaker JC, Lamont RF, Steer PJ. Timing of planned cesarean delivery by racial group. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:659–666. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318163cd55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Marttila R, Kaprio J, Hallman M. Respiratory distress syndrome in twin infants compared with singletons. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:271–276. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shinwell ES, Blickstein I, Lusky A, Reichman B. Effect of birth order on neonatal morbidity and mortality among very low birthweight twins: a population based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F145–F148. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.021584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mathews TJ, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2005 period linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2008;57:1–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sinha SK, Gupta S, Donn SM. Immediate respiratory management of the preterm infant. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;13:24–29. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2007.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.American Lung Association. Respiratory distress syndrome and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. [July 23 2009];2008 Available at: http://www.lungusa.org/site/c.dvLUK9O0E/b.4023541.
  • 15.Holzman C, Lin X, Senagore P, Chung H. Histologic chorioamnionitis and preterm delivery. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:786–794. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Feng R, Zhou G, Zhang M, Zhang H. Analysis of Twin Data Using SAS. Biometrics. 2008;65:584–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01098.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Falconer DS, Mackay TF. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Prentice Hall; Harlow, UK: 1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nagourney BA, Kramer MS, Klebanoff MA, Usher RH. Recurrent respiratory distress syndrome in successive preterm pregnancies. J Pediatr. 1996;129:591–596. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70125-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Myrianthopoulos NC, Churchill JA, Baszynski AJ. Respiratory distress syndrome in twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1971;20:199–204. doi: 10.1017/s1120962300011628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.van Sonderen L, Halsema EF, Spiering EJ, Koppe JG. Genetic influences in respiratory distress syndrome: a twin study. Semin Perinatol. 2002;26:447–449. doi: 10.1053/sper.2002.37315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marttila R, Haataja R, Ramet M, Lofgren J, Hallman M. Surfactant protein B polymorphism and respiratory distress syndrome in premature twins. Hum Genet. 2003;112:18–23. doi: 10.1007/s00439-002-0835-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lahti M, Marttila R, Hallman M. Surfactant protein C gene variation in the Finnish population - association with perinatal respiratory disease. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12:312–320. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hilgendorff A, Heidinger K, Bohnert A, Kleinsteiber A, Konig IR, Ziegler A, Lindner U, Frey G, Merz C, Lettgen B, Chakraborty T, Gortner L, Bein G. Association of polymorphisms in the human surfactant protein-D (SFTPD) gene and postnatal pulmonary adaptation in the preterm infant. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98:112–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01014.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pulkkinen V, Haataja R, Hannelius U, Helve O, Pitkanen OM, Karikoski R, Rehn M, Marttila R, Lindgren CM, Hastbacka J, Andersson S, Kere J, Hallman M, Laitinen T. G protein-coupled receptor for asthma susceptibility associates with respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Med. 2006;38:357–366. doi: 10.1080/07853890600756453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nogee LM, Garnier G, Dietz HC, Singer L, Murphy AM, deMello DE, Colten HR. A mutation in the surfactant protein B gene responsible for fatal neonatal respiratory disease in multiple kindreds. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:1860–1863. doi: 10.1172/JCI117173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bhandari V, Zhou G, Bizzarro MJ, Buhimschi C, Hussain N, Gruen JR, Zhang H. Genetic contribution to patent ductus arteriosus in the premature newborn. Pediatrics. 2009;123:669–673. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bhandari V, Bizzarro MJ, Shetty A, Zhong X, Page GP, Zhang H, Ment LR, Gruen JR. Familial and genetic susceptibility to major neonatal morbidities in preterm twins. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1901–1906. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lavoie PM, Pham C, Jang KL. Heritability of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, defined according to the consensus statement of the national institutes of health. Pediatrics. 2008;122:479–485. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bizzarro MJ, Hussain N, Jonsson B, Feng R, Ment LR, Gruen JR, Zhang H, Bhandari V. Genetic susceptibility to retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1858–1863. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kala P, Ten Have T, Nielsen H, Dunn M, Floros J. Association of pulmonary surfactant protein A (SP-A) gene and respiratory distress syndrome: interaction with SP-B. Pediatr Res. 1998;43:169–177. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199802000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ramet M, Haataja R, Marttila R, Floros J, Hallman M. Association between the surfactant protein A (SP-A) gene locus and respiratory-distress syndrome in the Finnish population. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:1569–1579. doi: 10.1086/302906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Haataja R, Ramet M, Marttila R, Hallman M. Surfactant proteins A and B as interactive genetic determinants of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:2751–2760. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.18.2751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Floros J, Fan R, Diangelo S, Guo X, Wert J, Luo J. Surfactant protein (SP) B associations and interactions with SP-A in white and black subjects with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Int. 2001;43:567–576. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-200x.2001.01474.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Haataja R, Marttila R, Uimari P, Lofgren J, Ramet M, Hallman M. Respiratory distress syndrome: evaluation of genetic susceptibility and protection by transmission disequilibrium test. Hum Genet. 2001;109:351–355. doi: 10.1007/s004390100574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Makri V, Hospes B, Stoll-Becker S, Borkhardt A, Gortner L. Polymorphisms of surfactant protein B encoding gene: modifiers of the course of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome? Eur J Pediatr. 2002;161:604–608. doi: 10.1007/s00431-002-1046-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Marttila R, Haataja R, Guttentag S, Hallman M. Surfactant protein A and B genetic variants in respiratory distress syndrome in singletons and twins. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168:1216–1222. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200304-524OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thomas NJ, Fan R, Diangelo S, Hess JC, Floros J. Haplotypes of the surfactant protein genes A and D as susceptibility factors for the development of respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:985–989. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES