Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 19.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2009 May 19;119(19):2633–2642. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.729863

Table 2. Traditional Research versus CBPR.

Research Phase Traditional Approach CBPR Approach
Team-Building Researchers plan project, form team including researchers, staff ± clinicians. Community and Academic (C&A) partners plan project, form team, develop shared mission, decision-making structure.
Study Selection/Design Researchers choose topic and design based on scientific theory, academic interest, evidence, data, methodologic feasibility. C&A also incorporate community priorities, insights, assets, emphasizing rigor and community feasibility, acceptability, context, cultural factors, local knowledge.
Funding Grant written by researchers, funds go to researchers. C&A co-develop grant, equitable division of funds based on contributions to project.
Implement Study, Analyze and Interpret Data Researchers solely responsible for study conduct, analyses. C&A collaborate on all efforts. Traditional analysis supplemented with community-driven questions and local relevance of findings.
Disseminate Findings Disseminate to academic audiences. C&A are co-authors and co-presenters, disseminate to academics, research participants, involved communities, policymakers.
Translate Research into Practice & Policy Research often ends with publication of results. C&A partners mobilize community to use findings to advocate for policy change, enhance local resources, improve local practices.
Sustain Team, Benefits, Resources When grant ends, researchers often move to new project. Sustainability built into work from inception, partners honor initial commitment to continue partnership and work beyond funding cycle.