Table 3.
Models examining program and environmental strategy effects on intermediate on HLP substance consumption.
| Intent to Use-Risk (ICC=.195) | Intent to Avoid Use-Protective (ICC=.191) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b | t | r | b | t | r | |
| Intercept | .30 | 9.46* | .40 | 2.04 | 34.58* | .85 |
| Time | .00 | .10 | .01 | .10 | 2.17* | .18 |
| Grade Contrast | .02 | .72 | .06 | .07 | 1.53 | .13 |
| Time*Grade Contrast | −.02 | −.98 | −.08 | .02 | .47 | .04 |
| Lifetime ATOD Use | .14 | 5.25* | .40 | −.14 | −2.80* | −.23 |
| AK Native/Amer. Indian | −.07 | −2.57* | −.21 | −.05 | −.92 | −.08 |
| Caucasian | −.06 | −1.98* | −.16 | .15 | 2.72* | .22 |
| Male | .03 | 1.20 | .10 | −.15 | −3.52* | −.28 |
| Red. Lunch | .01 | .25 | .02 | .02 | .47 | .04 |
Note: Analyses based on 622 total observations and 471 unique participants; SE can be calculated by taking the product of the t and B
*
p < .025, + p < .050