Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 22;107(2):581–586. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912997107

Table 2.

Ideal, FDT, and qG-FDT mean and variance response to the change in forcing or dissipation with the corresponding percentage errors for the five cases given in Table 1

Inline graphic
Case
Ideal
FDT
qG-FDT
FDT % error
qG-FDT % error
Inline graphic S 0.1814 0.1827 0.3197 0.70 76
B 0.1621 0.1633 0.3425 0.72 111
U 0.1555 0.1591 0.8655 2.29 457
PC-1 40.54 40.52 41.84 0.05 3.21
NAO 5.41 5.46 5.51 0.93 1.84
Inline graphic S 0.0533 0.0536 −0.0937 0.57 276
B 0.0486 0.0499 −0.1639 2.55 437
U 0.0401 0.0334 −0.8988 16.71 2339
PC-1 6.13 6.66 16.91 8.69 176
NAO −71.00 −71.16 −71.37 0.22 0.51
Inline graphic S −0.0522 −0.0540 −0.2331 3.4 346
B −0.0490 −0.0463 −0.3218 5.5 557
U −0.0630 −0.0702 −1.2797 11.5 1932
PC-1 11.23 11.24 16.02 0.08 42
NAO 0.470 0.473 0.715 0.72 52
Inline graphic S 0.0083 0.0071 0.157 15 1798
B 0.0104 0.0107 0.291 3.1 2714
U 0.0207 0.0304 1.56 47 7431
PC-1 36.25 36.16 34.30 0.23 5.4
NAO −5.185 −5.186 −8.1 0.03 56