Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan;33(Suppl 1):S11–S61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011

Table 12.

Reduction in 10-year risk of major CVD endpoints (CHD death/non-fatal MI) in major statin trials, or sub-studies of major trials, in diabetic subjects (N = 16,032)

Study (ref.) CVD prevention Statin dose and comparator Risk reduction Relative risk reduction Absolute risk reduction LDL cholesterol reduction (%)
4S-DM (211) Simvastatin 20–40 mg vs. placebo 85.7 to 43.2% 50% 42.5% 186 to 119 mg/dl (36%)
ASPEN 2° (216) Atorvastatin 10 mg vs. placebo 39.5 to 24.5% 34% 12.7% 112 to 79 mg/dl (29%)
HPS-DM (212) Simvastatin 40 mg vs. placebo 43.8 to 36.3% 17% 7.5% 123 to 84 mg/dl (31%)
CARE-DM (213) Pravastatin 40 mg vs. placebo 40.8 to 35.4% 13% 5.4% 136 to 99 mg/dl (27%)
TNT-DM (214) Atorvastatin 80 mg vs. 10 mg 26.3 to 21.6% 18% 4.7% 99 to 77 mg/dl (22%)
HPS-DM (212) Simvastatin 40 mg vs. placebo 17.5 to 11.5% 34% 6.0% 124 to 86 mg/dl (31%)
CARDS (234) Atorvastatin 10 mg vs. placebo 11.5 to 7.5% 35% 4.0% 118 to 71 mg/dl (40%)
ASPEN 1° (216) Atorvastatin 10 mg vs. placebo 9.8 to 7.9% 19% 1.9% 114 to 80 mg/dl (30%)
ASCOT-DM (215) Atorvastatin 10 mg vs. placebo 11.1 to 10.2% 8% 0.9% 125 to 82 mg/dl (34%)

Studies were of differing lengths (3.3–5.4 years) and used somewhat different outcomes, but all reported rates of CVD death and non-fatal MI. In this tabulation, results of the statin on 10-year risk of major CVD endpoints (CHD death/non-fatal MI) are listed for comparison between studies. Correlation between 10-year CVD risk of the control group and the absolute risk reduction with statin therapy is highly significant (P = 0.0007). Analyses provided by Craig Williams, PharmD, Oregon Health & Science University, 2007.