Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010 Feb;92(2):451–462. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32371

Table 2. Histological scoring guides.

Qualitative scoring guides used for histological scoring of each section based on the work of Hedberg et al. [7], Jansen et al. [15], and Mistry et al. [9]

Bone growth within scaffold pores
Description Score
Tissue in pores is mostly bone 4
Tissue in pores consists of some bone with fibrous tissue and/or a few inflammatory response elements 3
Tissue in pores is mostly fibrous tissue (with or without bone) and young fibroblasts invading the space with few macrophages present 2
Tissue in pores consists mostly of inflammatory cells and connective tissue components in between (with or without bone) OR the majority of the pores are empty or filled with fluid 1
Tissue in pores is dense and exclusively of inflammatory type (no bone present) 0

Bone contact at interface

Description Score

Direct bone to implant contact without soft tissue interlayer 4
Remodeling lacuna with osteoblasts and/or osteoclasts at surface 3
Majority of implant is surrounded by fibrous tissue capsule 2
Unorganized fibrous tissue (majority of tissue is not arranged as a capsule) 1
Inflammation marked by an abundance of inflammatory cells and poorly organized tissue 0

Polymer degradation

Description Score

Abundant degradation – almost complete degradation or complete fragmentation 4
Marked degradation – several cracks in implant with presence of several fragments throughout implant 3
Moderate degradation – some cracks in implant and/or some fragments towards edges and outer surface 2
Minimal degradation – some minor dissolution on edges, minor cracks in implant and/or small fragments present 1
No degradation – Completely intact polymer 0