. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010 Feb;92(2):451–462. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32371

Table 3. Percentage bone volume.

Percentage bone volume surrounding implanted scaffolds from each material group. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation for n = 6 for the PPF/PF-DA polymer alone and macrocomposite and n = 5 for the nanocomposite and low MW polymer group. No statistically significant differences were observed between material groups (p > 0.05).

Material Group	Bone Volume (%)
PPF/PF-DA Polymer	10.7 ± 4.5
PPF/PF-DA Macrocomposite	12.2 ± 3.5
PPF/PF-DA Nanocomposite	11.4 ± 2.9
PPF Degradation Control	11.9 ± 3.3