Skip to main content
. 2007 Apr 10;15(3):312–323. doi: 10.1080/09658210701256530

TABLE 3.

Regression model examining the contribution of past history of MDD and cue self-relevance to the prediction of number of specific memories retrieved on the AMT

Variable B SE B β t p
Model 1 Past MDD −2.30 2.23 .16 −1.03 .31
Model 2 Past MDD −2.84 2.13 −.20 −1.33 .19
Cue Self-Relevance −1.11 .49 −.33 −2.28 .03
Model 3 Past MDD 13.57 4.98 .93 2.73 .009
Cue Self-Relevance .17 .56 .05 .30 .77
Past MDD* Cue Self-Relevance −3.11 .87 −1.23 −3.56 .001

Model 1: R2 −.03, F(1, 42) =1.07, p = .31.

Model 2: R2 = .14, F(2, 41) = 3.20, ρ= .051, ΔR2 = .11, ΔF(1, 41) = 5.22, Sig ΔF p = .03.

Model 3: R2 = .34, F(3, 40) = 6.97, p = .001, ΔR2 = .21, ΔF(1, 40) = 12.69, Sig ΔF p = .001.