Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Emot. 2010 Jan 1;24(1):150–167. doi: 10.1080/02699930802618918

Table 3.

Correlations between individual differences variables and components of trade-off in emotional memory

Test specific recognition
general recognition
items backgrounds items backgrounds
Anxiety Measures
 Beck Anxiety Inventory, past month (BAI-M) r 0.15 −0.37 −0.01 −0.13
 (Beck et al., 1988) p 0.22 **.003 0.96 0.32
 Beck Anxiety Inventory, post-study (BAI-S) 0.18 −0.24 0.16 −0.01
 (Beck et al., 1988) 0.16 0.06 0.21 0.95
Visuospatial Working Memory
 Spatial Span, backwards (SS) −0.14 0.32 0.27 0.14
 (Wechsler, 1997) 0.27 0.01 0.03 0.28
Visual Working Memory
 Self-Ordered Pointing, total number of errors (SOP-E) −0.02 0.01 −0.18 0.12
 (Petrides & Milner, 1982) 0.91 0.96 0.16 0.34
 Self-Ordered Pointing, number of trials with errors (SOP-T) −0.09 0.00 −0.18 0.01
 (Petrides & Milner, 1982) 0.49 0.98 0.17 0.93
Executive Function
 Verbal fluency, number of perseverations (VF #) 0.39 −0.42 0.31 −0.28
 (Monsch et al., 1992) **.001 **.001 0.01 0.02
 Verbal fluency, percentage of perseverations (VF %) 0.38 −0.41 0.32 −0.30
 (Monsch et al., 1992) **.002 **.001 0.01 0.02
 Disexecutive questionnaire (DEX) 0.34 −0.20 0.34 0.01
 (Wilson et al., 1996) **.006 0.12 **.006 0.94

Trade-off in memory calculated separately for items and backgrounds as emotional minus neutral scene element

**

indicates significant at threshold of p=.006, when applying Bonferroni correction.