Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 25;29(47):14980–14986. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3706-09.2009

Table 3.

Working memory test data for right inferior parietal and focal superior parietal lesion groups

No Lesion Right InfPar Lesions Focal SupPar Lesions Kruskal-Wallis χ2 p value Significant between-group differences
Digit Span Forward 6.7 (1.2) 7.0 (1.4) 6.0 (1.1) 2.3 0.32 None
Digit Span Backward 5.0 (1.4) 5.5 (1.0) 3.3 (0.8) 8.9 0.01 SupPar<No Lesion
SupPar<RightInfPar
Spatial Span Forward 8.0 (1.5) 9.3 (1.2) 6.3 (2.9) 5.9 0.05 None
Spatial Span Backward 7.7 (1.8) 8.8 (0.8) 6.7 (2.6) 3.5 0.17 None
Letter-Number Sequencing 10.2 (2.4) 11.0 (2.3) 7.7 (1.0) 8.8 0.01 SupPar<No Lesion
SupPar<RightInfPar
Arithmetic 15.0 (3.3) 16.3 (1.5) 10.5 (2.7) 9.7 0.008 SupPar<No Lesion
SupPar<RightInfPar
0-Back errors 1.7 (3.8) 0.3 (0.8) 2.3 (3.0) 3.1 0.22 None
1-Back errors 4.4 (5.4) 3.8 (2.9) 6.5 (5.0) 1.7 0.44 None
2-Back errors 7.9 (4.4) 5.2 (3.8) 11.3 (3.5) 6.9 0.03 SupPar>No Lesion
SupPar>RightInfPar
3-Back errors 9.6 (3.6) 8.2 (3.0) 12.0 (3.6) 3.2 0.20 None

Means are presented with SDs in parentheses. Because of the small sample sizes, nonparametric tests were used to test for group effects and for the pairwise comparisons. Significant between-group differences were determined with the Mann–Whitney U test.