Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 29.
Published in final edited form as: Methodology (Gott). 2008;4(1):22–36. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.4.1.22

Table 3.

Table 3a Goodness-of-fit Indices of the Models (MHS Sample)
Model χ2 df RMSEA (90% CI) CFI TLI BIC Δχ2 / Δdf
CFA1 234 98 .07 (.06 - .08) .94 .92 6897 ---
CFA2a 167 86 .06 (.05 - .07) .96 .95 6897 67 / 12
CFA2b 167 86 .06 (.05 - .07) .96 .95 6897 ---
CFA2c 167 86 .06 (.05 - .07) .96 .95 6897 ---
CFA2d 167 86 .06 (.05 - .07) .96 .95 6897 ---
CFA3 180 95 .06 (.05 - .07) .96 .95 6859 13 / 9
CFA4 191 104 .06 (.04 - .07) .96 .95 6821 11 / 9
CFA5 248 116 .07 (.06 - .08) .94 .94 6811 57 / 12
CFA6 274 124 .07 (.06 - .08) .93 .93 6792 26 / 8
2LGC2a 182 91 .06 (.05 - .07) .96 .94 6884 ---
2LGC2b 185 91 .06 (.05 - .08) .96 .94 6887 ---
2LGC2c 181 91 .06 (.05 - .07) .96 .94 6882 ---
2LGC2d 183 91 .06 (.05 - .08) .96 .94 6884 ---
2LGC3 192 100 .06 (.05 - .07) .96 .95 6844 10 / 9
2LGC4 204 109 .06 (.05 - .07) .96 .95 6806 12 / 9
2LGC5 261 121 .07 (.06 - .08) .93 .94 6796 57 / 12
2LGC6 286 129 .07 (.06 - .08) .93 .93 6777 25 / 8
Table 3b Goodness-of-fit Indices of the Models (AAPT Sample)
Model χ2 df RMSEA (90% CI) CFI TLI BIC Δχ2 / Δdf
CFA1 210 80 .05 (.04 - .06) .95 .93 18427 ---
CFA2a 117 68 .03 (.02 - .04) .98 .97 18411 93 / 12
CFA2b 117 68 .03 (.02 - .04) .98 .97 18411 ---
CFA2c 117 68 .03 (.02 - .04) .98 .97 18411 ---
CFA3 187 76 .05 (.04 - .06) .95 .94 18430 70 / 8
CFA4 245 84 .06 (.05 - .06) .93 .92 18436 58 / 8
CFA5 461 96 .08 (.07 - .09) .85 .84 18575 216 / 12
CFA6 508 105 .08 (.07 - .09) .83 .82 18571 47 / 9
2LGC2a 138 74 .04 (.03 - .05) .97 .96 18393 ---
2LGC2b 126 74 .03 (.02 - .04) .98 .97 18381 12 / 0
2LGC2c 138 74 .04 (.03 - .05) .97 .96 18394 12 / 0
2LGC3 209 82 .05 (.04 - .06) .95 .93 18414 71 / 8
2LGC4 255 90 .05 (.04 - .06) .93 .92 18408 46 / 8
2LGC5 472 102 .08 (.07 - .09) .85 .84 18548 217 / 12
2LGC6 518 110 .08 (.07 - .09) .83 .84 18543 46 / 8