Skip to main content
. 2007 Feb 10;163(2):81–90. doi: 10.1007/s11046-007-0093-6

Table 4.

In vitro percentage adsorption of DON and ZON by different mineral clays, humic substances and yeast cell wall derived products as assessed by chemical and biological methods*

Producta DON ZON
HPLCb Bioassayc HPLCd Bioassaye
Ac Ak Ac Ak Ac Ak Ac Ak
Product1 8±8 9±6 5±3 4±8 17±7 35±7 30±10 40±12
Product2 4±4 5±10 2±3 3±3 38±8 32±8 51±13 24±16
Product3 7±10 12±9 5±3 4±3 40±8 23±5 60±14 34±11
Product4 11±15 18±8 6±5 10±3 25±5 11±8 39±12 33±15
Product5 13±15 12±5 10±5 12±6 2±4 1±2 36± 13 50± 15
Product6 7±8 10±11 11±6 13±8 97±0 99±0 98±2 97±2
Charcoal 88±7 93±8 70±6 80±10 93±8 100 100 100

*Values are means±SD of three independent experiments.

Ac = acidic adsorption.

Ak = alkaline adsorption.

aAll products were included at a concentrations of 2.5 mg/ml;

bDetection limit: 0.05 mg/l;

cCytotoxicity bioassay;

dDetection limit: 0.04 mg/l;

e Cell Proliferation bioassay.