Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan 22;114(6):1215–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.066

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Relationship between control and angle of exodeviation by alternate prism and cover test at distance fixation (A) and near fixation (B). Although there was a positive correlation (distance rs = 0.5, p=0.02, near rs = 0.5, p=0.01), there were notable examples of patients who had the same angle of deviation by alternate cover test and either excellent or poor control.