Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 20;4(4):409–416. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp031

Table 2.

Cue affect ratings by condition

Condition Arousal (s.e.m.) Positivity (s.e.m.) PA (s.e.m.)
UNC-ONLY
Uncertain high-gain 6.4a (0.2) 5.8i,j (0.2) 2.1r (0.2)
Uncertain low-gain 4.1c,d,e,f (0.5) 4.5k,l (0.4) −0.4u,v,z (0.4)
Uncertain low-loss 4.0c,d,e,f (0.4) 3.5m,n (0.3) −1.2x,z (0.2)
Uncertain high-loss 6.1a (0.3) 2.5o,p (0.3) −0.4t,v,x,y (0.3)
CERT-UNC
Uncertain high-gain 5.4a,b,c (0.5) 5.3j,k (0.3) 1.6r,s (0.5)
Uncertain low-gain 3.8d,f (0.4) 4.3k,m (0.3) −0.3u,w,y (0.3)
Uncertain low-loss 4.3b,e (0.4) 3.3l,m,o (0.4) −0.6w,x,z (0.3)
Uncertain high-loss 5.9a (0.3) 2.8n,o,p (0.4) 0.1s,u,w (0.4)
Certain high-gain 4.9b,d (0.5) 6.0i (0.3) 1.7r (0.4)
Certain low-gain 3.9c,e,f (0.5) 4.6k (0.3) 0.0t,w (0.3)
Certain low-loss 3.7e,f (0.4) 3.0n,o,p (0.3) −1.3z (0.2)
Certain high-loss 4.5b,c (0.4) 2.3p (0.4) −1.2y,z (0.3)

Note: Data are mean retrospective affect ratings (n = 10) of each condition's cue on 7-point Likert scales for arousal and positivity. PA was calculated from arousal and positivity (see text for formula). The s.e.m. are calculated within condition. Data points within a column that share subscripts do not differ at P < 0.05 (two tailed).