Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Jan;19(1):2–9. doi: 10.1002/pds.1845

Table 1.

Summary of the Number of Events and Covariate Terms Included when Adjusting for Potential Confounding, by Analytic Strategy

New Jersey Pennsylvania
Timeframe
 new users identified April 1, 2000 June 30, 2003 April 1, 2000 June 30, 2005
 covariates identified April 1, 1999 June 30, 2003 April 1, 1999 June 30, 2005
 outcomes identified April 2, 2000 December 31, 2003 April 2, 2000 December 31, 2005
Number of events (nonvertebral fractures within 12 months) N = 415 N = 636
 Alendronate,* n=182  Alendronate,* n=266
 Risedronate, n=64  Risedronate, n=119
 Calcitonin, n=123  Calcitonin, n=186
 Raloxifene, n=46  Raloxifene, n=65
Number of covariates in conventional model
• age dummies (31)
• month/year dummies (38)
• other dummies (7) 116
• other dichotomous (37)
• exposure (3)
Number of covariates in creating exposure propensity score (EPS)***
• age dummies (31)
• month/year dummies (38 New Jersey, 62 Pennsylvania) 113 137
• other dummies (7)
• other dichotomous (37)
Number of covariates in creating disease risk score (DRS)***
1. full cohort (EPS + exposure) 116 (full cohort) 140 (full cohort)
2. unexposed* only (same as EPS) 113 (unexposed only) 137 (unexposed only)
*

Alendronate = “unexposed”

Due to differences in timeframe available for analysis between states, rather than including a separate covariate for each month and year during the non-overlapping time period in the conventional analysis (when July 2003 to June 2005 are only applicable for recipients from Pennsylvania), we grouped treatment initiation dates June 2003 to June 2005 as a single referent.

We created state-specific EPS and DRS

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure