Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Jan;19(1):2–9. doi: 10.1002/pds.1845

Table 3.

Effectiveness (Nonvertebral Fractures Within 12 Months) Compared to Treatment with Alendronate, by Method of Confounder Adjustment, and Amount of Deviation From our Base Estimate

Risedronate, N=8,718 Calcitonin, N=8,372 Raloxifene, N=5,038
HR 95% CI % deviation HR 95% CI % deviation HR 95% CI % deviation
No. events, rate per 100 person-years follow-up No. events=183, rate=2.28 No. events=309, rate=4.03 No. events=111, rate=2.31
Unadjusted 1.00 0.84, 1.19 +1.0 1.77 1.53, 2.05 +28.3 1.01 0.82, 1.25 −13.2
Published estimate (single model EPS + covariates9) 1.01 0.85, 1.21 +2.4 1.40 1.20, 1.63 +1.2 1.18 0.96, 1.46 +1.0
Conventional multivariable model (base estimate) 0.99 0.83, 1.19 0.0 1.38 1.18, 1.61 0.0 1.17 0.95, 1.45 0.0
Exposure propensity score (EPS)
 Single model EPS 1.00 0.84, 1.20 +1.4 1.43 1.24, 1.67 +3.9 1.18 0.95, 1.45 +0.4
 Separate model EPS, restricted to overlap 0.98 0.82, 1.18 −0.9 1.41 1.21, 1.65 +2.4 1.13 0.91, 1.41 −3.2
Disease Risk Score (DRS)
 Full cohort DRS, restricted to DRSf overlap, N=43,066 1.00 0.84, 1.19 +1.3 1.48 1.28, 1.71 +7.1 1.18 0.96, 1.46 +1.2
 Unexposed DRS, restricted to overlap, N=43,057 0.99 0.83, 1.18 0.0 1.56 1.35, 1.81 +13.1 1.08 0.88, 1.34 −7.4
*

alendronate group, N=21,007; events=448, rate=2.28 per 100 person-years of follow-up

% deviation calculated as the difference between the observed hazard ratio and the “base estimate” hazard ratio, divided by the “base estimate” hazard ratio, multiplied by 100

Sample size: risedronate and alendronate (N=29,489), calcitonin and alendronate (N=29,309), raloxifene and alendronate (N=25,001)

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure