Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 8;6:83. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-83

Table 4.

Use and Appreciation of the two computer-tailored interventions.

Interventionbasic
Number (%)
Interventionplus
Number (%)
χ2
Use (0-1)
Readb 367/388 (95%) 400/418 (96%) 1.85
Savedb 215/355 (61%) 282/381 (74%) 15.17*
Discussedb 125/355 (35%) 151/381 (40%) 1.53
Use environmental information (0-1)
Read - 451/478 (94%)
Contacted sports club - 11/470 (2.3%)
Visited website - 52/470 (11%)
Walked/Cycled trailsb - 161/393 (41%)
Mapped out walking/cycling routeb - 57/393 (15%)
Did exercisesb - 73/393 (19%)

Appreciation (-2 to +2) Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Fa
Interesting 0.65 ± 0.72 0.85 ± 0.58 18.49**
Inviting 0.56 ± 0.75 0.80 ± 0.69 22.53**
Perceived individualization 0.26 ± 0.95 0.45 ± 0.86 11.36**
Comprehensible 0.98 ± 0.51 0.99 ± 0.46 0.00
Trustworthy 0.81 ± 0.58 0.93 ± 0.50 9.49**
Novelty -0.34 ± 0.1.0 -0.32 ± 0.97 1.31
Right quantity 0.72 ± 0.64 0.75 ± 0.70 1.91
Irritating -0.93 ± 0.87 -1.07 ± 0.95 4.62*
Appreciation environmental information (-2 to +2)
Interestingb - 0.74 ± 0.73
Motivatingb - -0.14 ± 0.94

a corrected for education level

b measured with 6-months questionnaire

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; numbers in bold typeface: significant associations