Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 3;158(7):1835–1847. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00468.x

Table 1.

Effect of prophylactic and therapeutic administration of theophylline on the changes in the left ankle diameter (mm) of adjuvant arthritic rats

Drug treatment Change in left ankle diameter (mm)
Prophylactic
Therapeutic
Day 14 Day 30 Day 25 Day 30
Saline-treated non-arthritic rats (group I) 0 0* 0 0*
Untreated arthritic rats (group II) 0.1 ± 0.01 0.34 ± 0.01 0.38 ± 0.02 0.34 ± 0.01
Theophylline-treated (45 mg·kg−1·day−1) arthritic rats (groups III) 0 0* 0.11 ± 0.01* 0.1 ± 0.001*
Theophylline-treated (30 mg·kg−1·day−1) arthritic rats (groups IV) 0 0* 0.14 ± 0.04* 0.12 ± 0.02*
Theophylline-treated (15 mg·kg−1·day−1) arthritic rats (groups V) 0 0* 0.16 ± 0.02* 014 ± 0.01*
Theophylline (30 mg·kg−1·day−1) in combination with SNP (1 mg·kg−1·day−1) (groups VI) 0.1 ± 0.01 0.1 ± 0.01* 0.13 ± 0.01* 0.15 ± 0.03*
Theophylline (30 mg·kg−1·day−1) in combination with SNP (0.01 mg·kg−1·day−1) (groups VII) 0 0* 0.13 ± 0.01* 0.1 ± 0.01*
Theophylline (30 mg·kg−1·day−1) in combination with L-NMMA (30 mg·kg−1·day−1) (groups VIII) 0 0* 0.11 ± 0.01* 0.1 ± 0.01*
*

P < 0.05 versus group II.

L-NMMA, L-NG-monomethyl arginine; SNP, sodium nitroprusside.