Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 3;158(7):1835–1847. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00468.x

Table 3.

Effect of prophylactic and therapeutic administration of theophylline on the pressure needed to induce a response in the right hind paw of adjuvant arthritic rats

Drug treatment % Decrease in pressure on right hind paw
Therapeutic
Prophylactic
Day 30 Day 25 Day 30 Day 14
Saline-treated non-arthritic rats (group I) 3.5 ± 0.1 2.3 ± 0.1* 8 ± 0.3* 2 ± 0.1*
Untreated arthritic rats (group II) 26.7 ± 1.4 54.9 ± 3 46 ± 2.6 54.9 ± 3
Theophylline-treated (45 mg·kg−1·day−1) arthritic rats (groups III) 2 ± 0.1* 0 14 ± 0.7* 5 ± 0.2*
Theophylline-treated (30 mg·kg−1·day−1) arthritic rats (groups IV) 14 ± 0.9* 8.7 ± 0.1* 18 ± 0.9* 14 ± 0.5*
Theophylline-treated (15 mg·kg−1·day−1) arthritic rats (groups V) 12.5 ± 0.7* 10 ± 0.1* 16 ± 1.1* 12 ± 0.9*
Theophylline (30 mg·kg−1·day−1) in combination with SNP (1 mg·kg−1·day−1) (groups VI) 35.7 ± 2.1 28.6 ± 0.3* 28 ± 1.3* 23 ± 1.4*
Theophylline (30 mg·kg−1·day−1) in combination with SNP (0.01 mg·kg−1·day−1) (groups VII) 23 ± 1.1 14.3 ± 0.3* 13 ± 0.9* 7 ± 0.8*
Theophylline (30 mg·kg−1·day−1) in combination with L-NMMA (30 mg·kg−1·day−1) (groups VIII) 6 ± 0.1* 4 ± 0.1* 14 ± 1.2* 8 ± 1.1*
*

P < 0.05 versus group II.

P < 0.05 versus groups IV.

L-NMMA, L-NG-monomethyl arginine; SNP, sodium nitroprusside.