Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2008;2008:1–8. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587433

Table 3.

Comparison of GDM and SSDM for segmentation of ENDO surfaces

GDM SSDM
MAD (mm) 0.98 ± 0.09 0.60 ± 0.08
HD (mm) 3.51 ± 0.15 1.54 ± 0.12
PTP (%) 95.7 ± 0.65 98.7 ± 0.54
PFP (%) 4.5 ± 0.65 1.21 ± 0.49