Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2008;2008:1–8. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587433

Table 4.

Comparison of GDM and SSDM for segmentation of EPI surfaces

GDM SSDM
MAD (mm) 1.34 ± 0.10 1.23 ± 0.09
HD (mm) 3.30 ± 0.15 1.67 ± 0.15
PTP (%) 93.3 ± 0.98 95.6 ± 0.89
PFP (%) 6.7 ± 0.80 4.5 ± 0.77