Table 3.
Associations between dietary pattern scores at phase 5 and CES–D depression at phase 7 (n = 3486)
|
Intermediate tertile
|
Highest tertile
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest tertile OR | OR (95% CI) | Pa | OR (95% CI) | Pa | |
| Whole food dietary pattern | |||||
| Model 1b | 1 | 0.62 (0.48-0.79) | 0.0002 | 0.64 (0.49-0.83) | 0.001 |
| Model 2c | 1 | 0.68 (0.52-0.89) | 0.004 | 0.74 (0.56-0.98) | 0.03 |
|
Model
3d |
1
|
0.71 (0.54-0.92)
|
0.01
|
0.74 (0.56-0.99)
|
0.04
|
| Processed food dietary pattern | |||||
| Model 1 | 1 | 1.28 (0.97-1.69) | 0.08 | 1.75 (1.25-2.45) | 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.22 (0.92-1.62) | 0.17 | 1.58 (1.12-2.23) | 0.009 |
| Model 3 | 1 | 1.22 (0.92-1.62) | 0.17 | 1.58 (1.11-2.23) | 0.01 |
CES—D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies — Depression scale.
a.
Value for trend.
b.
Model 1: adjusted for gender, age and energy intake.
c.
Model 2: model 1 plus adjustment for marital status, employment grade, education, physical activity and smoking habits.
d.
Model 3: model 2 plus adjustment for hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, self-reported stroke, use of antidepressive drugs and cognitive functioning.