Table 3.
Gene silencing effect of heterodimeric amiRNAs.
| Transgenic line | No. of independent transformants* | No. of plants with mutant phenotypes | Efficiency (%) | Effectiveness€ (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| none≠ (%) | Weak (%) | Strong (%) | ||||
| amiR-calA | 16 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | ||
| amiR-ap1AcalA | 17 | 1 (6) | 16 (94) | 0 | 94 | 0 |
| amiR-ap1APcalA | 15 | 1 (6.7) | 9 (60) | 5§ (33.3) | 93.3 | 100 |
| amiR-ap1AP/amiR-calA | 31$ | 10 (32) | 9 (29) | 12† (39) | n.a. | n.a. |
T1 or F1 plants were analyzed.
plants showing wild type phenotype
percentage of plants with null mutant phenotype showing indeterminate meristems among plants scored for strong phenotype
Among segregating F1 progenies, only bar-resistant plants were scored. n.a.: not applicable
All 5 plants with strong ap1cal phenotype produced indeterminate meristems.
4 out of 12 plants with strong ap1cal phenotype produced indeterminate meristems.