Table 5.

In-Migration Logit Results, Sensitivity Analysis, Low-Income Neighborhood Sample, 2000 Census

	10 year migration		1-Year Migration		Predominantly Non-Black Tract in 1990		Predominantly Black Tract in 1990
	(1a)	(1b)	(2a)	(2b)	(3a)	(3b)	(4a)	(4b)
White
<HS		0.094		0.088		0.095		0.115
HS	-0.057		-0.083		-0.099**		0.138
	(0.034)	0.089	(0.057)	0.082	(0.038)	0.088	(0.087)	0.128
College	0.612***		0.668***		0.486***		1.05***
	(0.035)	0.153	(0.059)	0.150	(0.040)	0.140	(0.089)	0.245
Black	0.174***		0.297**		0.179*		0.179
<HS	(0.047)	0.108	(0.096)	0.112	(0.073)	0.110	(0.105)	0.132
HS	0.259***		0.343***		0.164*		0.260*
	(0.048)	0.116	(0.098)	0.116	(0.076)	0.109	(0.106)	0.140
College	0.551***		0.637***		0.308***		0.622***
	(0.055)	0.146	(0.111)	0.146	(0.095)	0.122	(0.111)	0.183
Hispanic	0.200**		0.320*		0.128		-0.050
<HS	(0.064)	0.111	(0.131)	0.114	(0.070)	0.106	(0.179)	0.110
HS	0.125		0.200		0.072		-0.150
	(0.065)	0.104	(0.133)	0.104	(0.072)	0.101	(0.184	0.102
College	0.379***		0.437**		0.318***		0.317
	(0.078)	0.127	(0.150)	0.125	(0.086)	0.123	(0.213)	0.146
N	323,784		116,493		183,132		121,200

Notes: Columns 1a, 2a, 3a, 4a report β_j’s from a collapsed version of equation (1), with 9 race x education categories. Columns 1b, 2b, 3b and 4b report the predicted probabilities a migrant in the relevant subsample of the low-income neighborhood sample locates in a gentrifying neighborhood. Column 1 uses the same sample of migrants to low-income neighborhoods used in column 1 of Table 4. Column 2 uses only those migrants in the low-income neighborhood sample who moved into their current house in the year prior to the census. Columns 3 and 4 stratify the low-income neighborhood sample into tracts that were at least 50% black in 1990 and those that were not.