Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan;184(1):119–128. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.107474

TABLE 1.

Filtering process of the cis QTL candidates in the hippocampus of BXD

Steps of the filtering process No. of probe sets (genes) Additive effect (B vs. D ratio, %)
Affymetrix M430 v2.0 array data set 45,101 (23,080) 47:53
    A. cis QTL (LRS > 20, QTL mapped ± 3 Mb from source) 3,810 (2,856) 66:34
        cis QTL (LRS > 20, QTL mapped ± 5 Mb from source) 4,117 (3,064) 67:33
        cis QTL (LRS > 15, QTL mapped ± 3 Mb from source) 4,416 (3,279) 61:39
        cis QTL (LRS > 15, QTL mapped ± 5 Mb from source) 4,844 (3,548) 65:35
    B. cis QTL (LRS > 20, QTL mapped ± 3 Mb from source) fold difference between allelic expression >1.7 750 (630) 60:40
    C. Probes associated with potentially true cis QTL—filtering out the remaining 440 cis QTL was based on: 190 (166) 49:51
        Potential SNP overlapping probes (70%) 308 (302) 74:23
        Alternative 3′-UTR processing (14%) 62 (62) 76:24
        Alternative splicing (10%) 44 (44) 72:28
    Other (6%)
26 (25)
64:36