Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 12;10(3):1071. doi: 10.1208/s12249-009-9300-8

Table V.

Results for Evaluation of Tablet

Formulations Hardnessa (kg/cm2) Friability (%) Content uniformitya (%)
I 3.76 ± 0.15 0.53 97.60 ± 1.65
II 3.93 ± 0.15 0.52 99.01 ± 1.51
III 4.13 ± 0.11 0.24 97.77 ± 0.43
IV 4.06 ± 0.25 0.27 96.70 ± 0.80
V 4.06 ± 0.25 0.80 99.25 ± 0.65
VI 4.03 ± 0.057 0.37 97.85 ± 2.58
VII 3.9 ± 0.2 0.57 98.84 ± 1.17
VIII 4.03 ± 0.2 0.27 98.02 ± 0.74
IX 4.06 ± 0.25 0.76 97.19 ± 0.76
X 3.73 ± 0.11 0.59 96.12 ± 0.20
XI 3.66 ± 0.057 0.53 98.51 ± 0.43
XII 3.83 ± 0.057 0.46 98.20 ± 0.99
XIII 4.06 ± 0.25 0.56 97.44 ± 0.52
XIV 3.66 ± 0.11 0.25 97.11 ± 1.17
XV 3.9 ± 0.26 0.22 99.17 ± 0. 87
F I 4.03 ± 0.11 0.31 98.35 ± 0.57
F II 4.16 ± 0.11 0.14 96.28 ± 0.86
F III 3.96 ± 0.15 0.48 97.36 ± 0.14
F IV 3.9 ± 0.26 0.34 98.84 ± 0.14
F V 3.93 ± 0.15 0.23 96.61 ± 1.14

aAll values are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3

F formulation