Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2010 Jan;9(1):595–604. doi: 10.1021/pr9005603

Table 3. Differential Expression Comparison, Comparative Proteomics Studies.

Summary of performance of preprocessing methods in detecting differential expression in comparative proteomics studies. The p-values are from two-sample t-tests performed on the log-transformed spot quantifications for the various methods. The q-values are local FDR estimates, and measure the probability that a given spot would be a false positive if it is declared differentially expressed.

Method Number of Spots q-values p-values
<0.15 <0.20 <0.001 <0.005 <0.01 <0.05
D1 Pinnacle 719 2 3 3 6 17 76
SameSpots 1094 0 0 0 0 1 17
SameSpots +PG 1319 0 0 0 1 3 24
SameSpots +edits 1153 0 0 0 0 1 11
SamesSpots +edits (PG) 1255 0 0 0 0 1 13
D2 Pinnacle 1136 5 7 5 10 20 107
SameSpots 1410 0 0 2 11 24 123
SameSpots +PG 1928 0 0 2 16 35 151
SameSpots +edits 1390 0 0 1 14 32 157
SamesSpots +edits (PG) 1458 0 0 0 12 27 159