Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biophys Chem. 2009 Sep 1;145(2-3):47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2009.08.007

Figure 4. Qualitatively forward, quantitatively reverse reactions.

Figure 4

The reactions that are qualitatively assigned to be forward in iAF1260, yet quantitatively reversible, using at least one group contribution estimate of reactant standard transformed Gibbs energy of formation. The feasible range of ΔrG′ and ΔrGestm are given as red and blue bars respectively. Far left are transport reactions with negative or zero physiological standard transformed reaction Gibbs energy, ΔrG′m ≤ 0, but reversible depending on concentration of reactants. Reactions with uncertainty due to estimation of standard transformed reaction Gibbs energy are rank ordered by decreasing probability that physiological standard transformed reaction Gibbs energy is negative. In mathematical notation this probability is represented by the symbol PrG′m < 0), as defined in Eq. 3, and used in situabove to denote the intervals as follows: Reactions with PrG′m < 0) > 0.7 were assumed to be irreversible in the forward direction, and reactions with PrG′m < 0) < 0.3 or ΔrG′m > 0, were assumed to be irreversible in the reverse direction. See Figure 12 for a detailed illustration of the latter reactions. Reactions with 0.7 ≥ PrG′m < 0) > 0.3 were allowed to be quantitatively reversible in lieu of the large uncertainty in estimation of standard transformed reaction Gibbs energy.