TABLE 4.
Study | Study design | Clinician specialty* | Patients/procedures, n | Cecal intubation rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pierzchajlo et al (11); Setting: Two hospitals | Prospective | Family physician (n=1) | 751 colonoscopies | 91.5 |
Wexner et al (12); Setting: Two hospitals | Retrospective | Surgeons (n=4) | 2069 colonoscopies | 96.5 |
Wexner et al (13); Setting: Two hospitals | Prospective | Gastroenterologists (n=207) | 13,580 colonoscopies | 92.0 |
Kirby (14); Setting: Single hospital | Retrospective | Surgeon (n=1) | 616 colonoscopies | 76.0† |
Edwards and Norris (15); Setting: Single hospital | Prospective | Family physicians (n=4) | 200 colonoscopies | 96.5 |
Minoli et al (17); Setting: Four endoscopy units | Prospective | Gastroenterologists | 486 colonoscopies | 91.1 |
Nelson et al (18); Setting: 13 VA Medical Centers | Prospective | Gastroenterologists | 3196 screening colonoscopies | 97.2 |
Chak et al (26); Setting: Single teaching hospital | Prospective | Gastroenterologists (n=17) | 496 colonoscopies | 94.3 |
Rex (27); Setting: Single teaching hospital | Prospective | Gastroenterologist (n=1) | 358 patients | 99.2 |
Fasoli et al (28); Setting: Multicentre (25 sites) | Prospective | Gastroenterologist teams (n=1), Surgeon teams (n=18), Mixed teams (n=21) | 1406 colonoscopies | 84.1 |
Ball et al (29); Setting: Single teaching hospital | Retrospective | Gastroenterologists, surgeons | 1166 colonoscopies | 88.1 |
Denis et al (30); Setting: Single hospital | Prospective | Gastroenterologists (n=5) | 500 colonoscopies | 92.0 |
Harewood (31); Setting: Single teaching hospital | Retrospective | Endoscopists (n=45) | 17,100 colonoscopies | 93.9 |
Regula et al (60); Setting: A national screening program in Poland (6 to 40 sites at study end) | Prospective | Not specified | 50,148 colonoscopies | 91.1 |
Unless shown, the number of persons performing the procedure was not reported in the paper;
Unweighted 12-year mean. VA Veterans affairs