Table 4.

Summary of hierarchical regression analyses predicting depressive symptom categories

Variable	B			SE B			β			R2			ΔR2
	Ta	Pa	Sa	T	P	S	T	P	S	T	P	S	T	P	S
Black
Step 1										.02	.02	.02
Income	−2.40	−1.29	−1.07	1.20	.69	.63	−.15*	−.14	−.12	–	–	–
Education	−.39	−.25	.12	.89	.51	.47	−.03	−.04	.01	–	–	–
Step 2										.02	.02	.02	.00	.00	.00
Income	−2.39	−1.31	−1.05	1.2	.69	.64	−.15*	−.14	−.12	–	–	–
Education	−.37	−.27	.14	0.90	.52	.47	−.03	−.04	.02	–	–	–
ParEffic.	.03	−.06	.07	.18	.11	.10	.01	−.04	.05	–	–	–
Hispanic
Step 1										.01	.02	.01
Income	−.60	.06	−.41	2.28	1.21	1.17	−.04	.01	−.05	–	–	–
Education	−.74	−.57	−.15	1.05	.56	.54	−.09	−.14	−.04	–	–	–
Step 2										.09	.11	.03	.08†	.09†	.02
Income	−2.06	−.82	−.81	2.03	1.2	1.2	−.12	−.09	−.09	–	–	–
Education	−1.04	−.75	−.23	1.02	1.54	1.54	−.13	−.18	−.06	–	–	–
ParEffic.	−.67	−.41	−.18	.30	.16	.16	−.30*	−.34*	−.16	–	–	–
White
Step 1										.01	.01	.00
Income	−1.60	−.80	−.41	.92	.49	.49	−.10	−.09	−.05	–	–	–
Education	−.44	−.20	−.17	.53	.28	.28	−.05	−.04	−.03	–	–	–
Step 2										.03	.03	.02	.02	.02	.02
Income	1.52	−.75	−.37	.91	.49	.49	−.09	−.08	−.04	–	–	–
Education	−.45	−.21	−.18	.53	.28	.28	−.05	−.04	−.03	–	–	–
ParEffic.	−.27	−.16	−.14	.12	.06	.06	−.12*	−.14*	−.12*	–	–	–

^aT total depressive symptoms, P psychological depressive symptoms, S somatic depressive symptoms

^*p < .05

^†Although there are relatively large ΔR² values for the Hispanic mothers, the overall regression was not significant