Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul;193(1):51–59. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.043190

Table 2.

Comparison of patterns of attendance for follow-up assessment between the two study groups

Attendance Structured care group n (%) CBT group n (%) Both groups n (%) Relative riska (95% CI)
All four post-treatment assessments (3, 6, 9, 12 months) 49 (65) 58 (77) 107 (71) 0.9 (0.7-1.0) χ2=2.09, P=0.15
Three assessments 4 4 8
    3, 6, 9 months only 1 2 3
    3, 6, 12 months only 1 0 1
    3, 9, 12 months only 2 2 4
Two assessments 4 1 5
    3, 6 months only 2 0 2
    3, 9 months only 1 1 2
    3, 12 months only 1 0 1
One assessment 4 2 6
    3 months only 3 2 5
    6 months only 1 0 1
Did not attend any follow-up assessment 14 (18) 10 (13) 24 (16) 1.4 (0.7-3.0) χ2=0.45, P=0.50
Total 75 75 150

CBT, cognitive—behavioural therapy.

a. Structured care v. CBT.