Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun;194(6):535–540. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.056093

Table 2.

Accuracy of facial expression recognition following citalopram or placebo assessed after the functional magnetic resonance imaging scana

Expression Citalopram (n = 13) Mean (s.e.) Placebo (n = 13) Mean (s.e.) Significance
Anger 21.2 (1.2) 18.6 (1.03) t(24) = 1.6, P = 0.12
Disgust
13.7 (1.6)
18.2 (1.5)
t(24) = –2.0, P = 0.06
Fear
19.2 (1.1)
17.5 (1.2)
t(24) = 0.99, P = 0.33
Happiness
25.8 (0.4)
24 (0.8)
t(24) = 2.06, P = 0.05
Sadness
18.4 (1.6)
17.4 (1.6)
t(24) = 0.45, P = 0.904
Surprise
21 (1.6)
22 (0.9)
t(24) = –0.54, P = 0.66
Neutral
7.6 (0.4)
7.5 (0.5)
t(24) = 0.12, P = 0.59
a.

Recognition accuracy for happy facial expressions was significantly increased in the citalopram group compared with the placebo group