Table 1.
Younger and older user characteristics by condition
Age Group Pa | Younger Users | Older Users | |||||||||
Hierarchical | Tag-Based | tb | Hierarchical | Tag-Based | tb | ||||||
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
Age (years) | 19.4 | 1.7 | 19.6 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 70.6 | 5.8 | 69.4 | 5.5 | −0.8 | |
Length of computer usec | .002 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.2 | −1.0 | 4.5 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
Frequency of computer used | .001 | 5.9 | 1.0 | 5.6 | 1.0 | −1.1 | 5.0 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 1.6 | −0.5 |
Number of medications takene | < .001 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 4.1 | 2.8 | 5.2 | 3.5 | 1.2 |
Health literacyf | .12 | 35.2 | 1.1 | 35.5 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 34.6 | 2.6 | 35.1 | 1.3 | 0.9 |
Vocabularyg | .001 | 30.2 | 3.2 | 27.2 | 5.9 | −2.2 | 37.6 | 20.4 | 34.6 | 4.6 | −0.7 |
Memory spanh | .02 | 10.6 | 2.0 | 9.8 | 2.9 | −1.1 | 8.3 | 3.0 | 9.5 | 2.6 | 1.5 |
Spatial visualizationi | < .001 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
Spatial orientationj | .01 | 9.8 | 3.2 | 10.9 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 8.6 | 2.8 | 8.8 | 2.5 | 0.2 |
Perceptual speedk | < .000 | 66.7 | 10.3 | 66.0 | 9.9 | −0.3 | 49.1 | 10.8 | 50.3 | 8.6 | 0.4 |
aOne-way ANOVA.
b ttests showed no significant condition differences (within each age group) at P <.001 (stricter Pcriterion used to compensate for inflated degrees of freedom due to multiple comparisons).
c Total length of computer experience on a scale of 1 (less than 6 months) to 5 (greater than 5 years).
d Frequency of computer use on a scale of 1 (once every few months) to 7 (daily, most of the day).
e Prescription medications only.
f Test of health literacy composite score (STOFHLA) [15]; higher equals better health literacy.
g Shipley vocabulary score; higher is better [16].
h Reverse digit span [17].
i Paper folding test [18].
j Cube comparison test [18].
kDigit symbol substitution (number correct [19]).