Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 6.
Published in final edited form as: Biopolymers. 2008 May;89(5):443–454. doi: 10.1002/bip.20864

Table II.

Backbone Dihedral Anglesa of Crystalline Ac-Clp–OMe (10) Derived from X-Ray Diffraction Analysis Compared to Those of Ac-Hyp-OMe69

Compound Ring Pucker φ ψ ω δBD (Å) τBD (°)
Ac-Clp-OMe (10) Cγ-exo −56.0 147.5 179.2 2.80 94.1
Ac-Hyp-OMe Cγ-exo −56.9 150.8 178.9 2.82 91.8
a

For both 10 and Ac–Hyp–OMe, there were two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit of the crystal. Values shown here are the average for these two molecules.