Skip to main content
. 2007 Jan 26;99(4):653–660. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl291

Table 1.

Summary statistics for the relative amounts of individual sugars in single-nectary nectar samples of the two Aquilegia species under field and glasshouse conditions

Aquilegia p. cazorlensis Aquilegia vulgaris
Sugar Field Glasshouse Field Glasshouse
Glucose (%)
 Mean ± s.d. 2·4 ± 2·7 1 ± 0·5 3·6 ± 2·4 1·1 ± 0·5
 Range 0–13·5 0·4–2·9 0–9·5 0·4–2·5
 Interquartile range 0·7–3·1 0·6–1·3 1·9–5·4 0·7–1·3
Fructose (%)
 Mean ± s.d. 10·9 ± 15·4 0·6 ± 0·6 20·5 ± 19·3 1·1 ± 0·4
 Range 0–60·6 0–2·3 0–78·5 0·3–3
 Interquartile range 1·3–10·9 0·2–0·7 6·6–27·1 0·6–1·4
Sucrose (%)
 Mean ± s.d. 86·6 ± 17·1 98·4 ± 0·86 75·9 ± 21·2 97·9 ± 0·9
 Range 35·3–100 94·9–99·6 11·9–100 94·5–99·3
 Interquartile range 84·1–97·9 98·1–98·9 69·4–91·7 97·4–98

Aquilegia p. cazorlensis: field, n = 48 nectaries from 24 flowers and 8 plants; glasshouse, n = 48 nectaries from 16 flowers and 8 plants. A. vulgaris: field, n = 46 nectaries from 24 flowers and 8 plants; glasshouse n = 39 nectaries from 13 flowers and 1 plant.