Table 2.
The top ten divergences making the largest contribution to present-day LMA variation (ranked 1–10). For these divergences, the rank of the contribution to 2C DNA variation explained by these nodes (2C DNA rank) was also determined. The contribution index for both LMA and 2C DNA is listed (for details on calculations see Materials and Methods). The sign of the contrast is set so that genome size is always positive and contrasts in LMA are then compared in the same direction across the node. Thus, a positive contrast refers to the larger genome species having higher LMA, and a negative contrast refers to the larger genome species having lower LMA.
Rank | LMA contribution | Divergences making the largest contribution | 2C DNA rank | 2C DNA contribution | Sign of contrast |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0·574 | Angiosperms vs. gymnosperms | 1 | 0·465 | + |
2 | 0·041 | Polytomy at the base of the core eudicots | 11 | 0·006 | + |
3 | 0·037 | Polytomy at the base of Poales | 3 | 0·067 | – |
4 | 0·032 | Proteales vs. core eudicots | 41 | 0·001 | – |
5 | 0·029 | Polytomy across monocots, magnoliids and eudicots | 2 | 0·074 | – |
6 | 0·014 | Prosopis glandulosa vs. the rest of Fabaceae | 54 | <0·001 | + |
7 | 0·012 | Poales vs. the rest of the commelinids | 25 | 0·002 | – |
8 | 0·011 | Larix spp. and Pseudotsuga menziesii vs. the rest of Pinaceae | 52 | <0·001 | + |
9 | 0·011 | Divergence at the base of eurosid 2 | 12 | 0·006 | + |
10 | 0·010 | Polytomy at the base of the rosids | 81 | <0·001 | + |