Skip to main content
. 2007 Jan 4;99(3):495–505. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl271

Table 2.

The top ten divergences making the largest contribution to present-day LMA variation (ranked 1–10). For these divergences, the rank of the contribution to 2C DNA variation explained by these nodes (2C DNA rank) was also determined. The contribution index for both LMA and 2C DNA is listed (for details on calculations see Materials and Methods). The sign of the contrast is set so that genome size is always positive and contrasts in LMA are then compared in the same direction across the node. Thus, a positive contrast refers to the larger genome species having higher LMA, and a negative contrast refers to the larger genome species having lower LMA.

Rank LMA contribution Divergences making the largest contribution 2C DNA rank 2C DNA contribution Sign of contrast
1 0·574 Angiosperms vs. gymnosperms 1 0·465 +
2 0·041 Polytomy at the base of the core eudicots 11 0·006 +
3 0·037 Polytomy at the base of Poales 3 0·067
4 0·032 Proteales vs. core eudicots 41 0·001
5 0·029 Polytomy across monocots, magnoliids and eudicots 2 0·074
6 0·014 Prosopis glandulosa vs. the rest of Fabaceae 54 <0·001 +
7 0·012 Poales vs. the rest of the commelinids 25 0·002
8 0·011 Larix spp. and Pseudotsuga menziesii vs. the rest of Pinaceae 52 <0·001 +
9 0·011 Divergence at the base of eurosid 2 12 0·006 +
10 0·010 Polytomy at the base of the rosids 81 <0·001 +