Table 4.
αRMA (95% CI) | Log βPMA (95% CI) | r2 | |
---|---|---|---|
Angiosperm data set (n=714) | |||
Log MA vs. log MR | 1·03 (1·01, 1·06) | 0·418 (0·393, 0·444) | 0·944 |
Log MS vs. log MR | 1·04 (1·01, 1·08) | 0·366 (0·340, 0·392) | 0·943 |
Conifer data set (n=787) | |||
Log MA vs. log MR | 1·10 (1·06, 1·14) | 0·477 (0·425, 0·528) | 0·751 |
Log MS vs. log MR | 1·18 (1·13, 1·22) | 0·331 (0·275, 0·388) | 0·739 |
MA vs. MR or MS vs. MR scaling exponents in bold type have 95% CIs that numerically include those reported at the level of individual plants (αRMA=1·06 and 1·08, respectively; see Niklas, 2005).