Table 4.
Onobrychis |
Lotus |
Cichorium |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | P | Estimate | P | Estimate | P | ||||
Leaves | Intercept | τ0 | 75·99 | *** | 37·91 | *** | 4·29 | *** | |
c×τ1 | −2·46 | 0·579 | 9·34 | ** | 0·82 | 0·496 | |||
Temporal | t | τ2 | 2·33 | *** | 1·72 | *** | −0·11 | 0·527 | |
t | c×τ3 | −0·67 | 0·469 | 1·09 | 0·061 | 0·099 | 0·695 | ||
Stems | Intercept | τ0 | 24·88 | *** | 12·03 | *** | 7·8 | ** | |
c×τ1 | −2·21 | 0·591 | 0·81 | 0·563 | – | – | |||
Temporal | t | τ2 | −1·25 | 0·131 | −0·19 | 0·376 | −0·37 | 0·51 | |
t | c×τ3 | 0·69 | 0·489 | 0·42 | 0·156 | – | – | ||
Roots | Intercept | τ0 | 3·13 | *** | 27·35 | *** | 2·04 | * | |
c×τ1 | 1·74 | 0·64 | −2·97 | 0·491 | 0·88 | 0·453 | |||
Temporal | t | τ2 | −0·29 | 0·056 | 0·53 | 0·404 | −0·07 | 0·69 | |
t | c×τ3 | −0·14 | 0·482 | 0·39 | 0·681 | 0·09 | 0·734 | ||
Harvest | Intercept | τ0 | 63·58 | *** | 24·16 | *** | 4·57 | *** | |
c×τ1 | −4·1 | 0·216 | 4·16 | ** | 0·53 | 0·656 | |||
Temporal | t | τ2 | 0·79 | 0·11 | 0·33 | 0·083 | −0·06 | 0·716 | |
t | c×τ3 | −0·5 | 0·467 | 0·39 | 0·15 | 0·05 | 0·85 | ||
Whole plant | Intercept | τ0 | 46·72 | *** | 23·12 | *** | 4·05 | *** | |
c×τ1 | −4·12 | 0·093 | 2·64 | ** | −0·11 | 0·882 | |||
Temporal | t | τ2 | −0·51 | 0·154 | 0·28 | * | −0·05 | 0·652 | |
t | c×τ3 | −0·36 | 0·48 | 0·21 | 0·292 | −0·05 | 0·761 | ||
Cultivar×week | −0·05 | 0·467 | 0·039 | 0·15 | 0·005 | 0·85 |
Estimated coefficients and P-values of the multiple linear regression models presented in eqn (3), for each species. Intercepts can be interpreted as the tannin concentration in mid-season, the sum of the temporal coefficients as the weekly change in tannin concentration (mg CT g−1 d. wt week−1).
* P<0·05; ** P<0·01; *** P<0·001.