Table 3.
Differences in fruit set, fruit predation likelihood and seed production related to experimental treatment and study population
Fixed effects | Fruit set |
Fruit predation |
Seed production |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F3,408 | P | F3,408 | P | F3,392 | P | |
Treatment (Tre) | 5·58 | 0·003 | 1·83 | 0·24 | 0·11 | 0·98 |
Population (Pop) | 0·06 | 0·84 | 0·63 | 0·84 | 35·18 | 0·003 |
Fruit set (FrS) | – | – | 9·75 | 0·002 | – | – |
Sprayed | 0·33 | 0·56 | 38·19 | 0·001 | 0·16 | 0·70 |
Fruit predation (FrP) | – | – | – | – | 15·54 | 0·001 |
Tre×Pop | 2·34 | 0·24 | 1·52 | 0·38 | 0·58 | 0·67 |
Tre×FrS | – | – | 0·38 | 0·82 | – | – |
Tre×FrP | – | – | – | – | 1·09 | 0·36 |
Plant size | 0·20 | 0·65 | 2·89 | 0·08 | 0·41 | 0·52 |
Block effect | L Ratio | P | L Ratio | P | L Ratio | P |
Plant | 14·45 | 0·001 | 6·79 | 0·01 | 1·23 | 0·27 |
Individual plants were considered as blocks. P-values were calculated by bootstrapping (1000 repetitions). Significant effects are presented in bold.