Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 7.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Genet. 2009 May 3;41(6):708–711. doi: 10.1038/ng.372

Table 2.

Replication of SNP markers discovered in the GWA study

Ethnicity rs12587781 rs1154155 rs1263646
Caucasians C C G
 Freq Controls (n) 0.14 (352) 0.14 (348) 0.16 (351)
 Freq Cases (n) 0.22 (353) 0.22 (343) 0.24 (353)
  χ 2 17.08 17.04 13.66
 P 3.58 × 10−5 3.67 × 10−4 2.19 × 10−4
 OR (95% CI) 1.79 (1.36-2.37) 1.80 (1.36-2.39) 1.65 (1.26-2.15)
Asians C C G
 Freq Controls (n) 0.61 (601) 0.47 (599) 0.45 (600)
 Freq Cases (n) 0.68 (552) 0.57 (549) 0.51 (553)
  χ 2 11.09 26.76 9.81
 P 8.70 × 10−4 2.30 × 10−7 1.73 × 10−3
 OR (95% CI) 1.34 (1.13-1.59) 1.54 (1.31-1.82) 1.30 (1.10-1.53)
African Americans C C G
 Freq Controls (n) 0.11 (142) 0.08 (138) 0.13 (139)
 Freq Cases (n) 0.13 (124) 0.10 (113) 0.17 (124)
  χ 2 0.70 0.74 1.08
 P 0.40 0.39 0.30
 OR (95% CI) 1.25 (0.74-2.13) 1.31 (0.71-2.42) 1.29 (0.80-2.09)

Note: Frequencies at the 3 SNPs did not differ between DQB1*0602 positive (n=81) versus DQB1*0602 negative (n=271) controls within the subset of Caucasians with that information. In addition, allele frequency of these three SNPs did not differ between DQB1*0602 positive (n=470) and negative (n=1375) Caucasian controls.