Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Radiol. 2007 Sep 28;37(12):1201–1208. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0605-z

Table 1.

The percentage of scans in which each target finding was identified by the first, second and third readers. The third readers were sent only those films that the first or second reader thought abnormal. The last column lists the percentage of images in which each finding was agreed to by any two readers (concordant readings)

Target finding Reader Final agreement

First Second Third
Intraventricular 25 24 41 24
   hemorrhage
Ventriculomegaly 12 13 23 12
   (moderate/severe)
Hyperechoic lesion 23 22 27 16
Hypoechoic lesion 8.5 8.1 14 7.8