Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2009 Sep 12;394(1):160–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.09.009

Figure 4. Angle-projected energy landscapes of apo-AdK.

Figure 4

A: The free energy surface Inline graphic (θNMP, θLID) is shown as a function of the NMP–CORE angle θNMP and the LID–CORE angle θLID. The closed state structure 1AKE is taken as the reference with Inline graphic(1AKE) = 0. A few typical DIMS transition paths are also shown (closed→open; - - - open→closed). Crystal structures are drawn in the same positions as in Figure 3. Errors as estimated from the standard deviation of a block average are typically smaller than 1 kcal/mol. B: Potential energy landscape ΔE(θNMP, θLID) = E(θNMP, θLID) −E(1AKE). The closed state is taken as the reference so that ΔE(1AKE) = 0. The average energy of a conformation, E(θNMP, θLID), in bins of size Δθ = 5° is calculated from the umbrella sampling simulations as the statistical mechanical average of the potential energy less the umbrella biasing contribution, E(θNMP,θLID)=U(θNMP(t),θLID(t)uumbrella(θNMP,θLID). The standard deviation on ΔE is typically on the order of 200 kcal/mol (not shown).