Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatrics. 2008 Apr 7;121(5):e1167–e1177. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0423

TABLE 5.

Growth Outcomes at 18 to 22 Months’ Corrected Age: Univariate Analyses

Outcomea Group
No IVH/No Shunt
(N = 5163)
IVH 3/No Shunt
(N = 459)
IVH 3/Shunt
(N = 103)b
IVH 4/No Shunt
(N = 311)
IVH 4/Shunt
(N = 125)c
Weight z score
 Mean (SE) −1.35 (0.02) −1.43 (0.07) −1.53 (0.15) −1.47 (0.08) −2.47 (0.13)f
 Median −1.32 −1.33 −1.63 −1.42 −2.32
Weight <10th percentile, n (%) 2594/5118 (51) 236/457 (52) 57/101 (56) 169/307 (55) 92/124 (74)f
Length z score
 Mean (SE) −0.85 (0.02) −0.88 (0.06) −1.05 (0.12) −0.89 (0.07) −1.48 (0.12)f
 Median −0.80 −0.83 −1.15 −0.95 −1.55
Length at the <10th percentile, n (%) 1725/5112 (34) 161/457 (35) 43/99 (43) 121/307 (39) 68/123 (55)e
HC z score
 Mean (SE) −0.51 (0.02) −0.63 (0.06) −0.90 (0.19) −0.79 (0.09) −1.66 (0.18)f
 Median −0.47 −0.64 −1.02 −0.81 −1.70
HC at the <10th percentile, n (%) 1245/5112 (24) 135/456 (30) 40/101 (40)d 108/306 (35) 76/125 (61)f
a

Information was missing for weight (54), length (63), and HC (61).

b

Statistically significant comparisons between IVH 3/shunt versus IVH 3/no shunt are shown. Comparisons between IVH 3/shunt versus no IVH/no shunt were statistically significant for length (z score: P = .02; <10th percentile: P = .04) and for HC (P < .01 for z score and <10th percentile) but not for weight (z score: P = .06; <10th percentile: P = .3).

c

Statistically significant comparisons between IVH 4/shunt versus IVH 4/no shunt are shown. Comparisons between IVH 4/shunt versus no IVH/no shunt were statistically significant for all outcomes (P < .001 for all).

d

P ≤ .05,

e

P ≤ .01,

f

P ≤ .001 for IVH 3/shunt versus IVH 3/no shunt or for IVH 4/shunt versus IVH 4/no shunt by the χ2 or Wilcoxon test.