Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov;98(5):975–993. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl191

Table 3.

Correlation coefficients between the four metric parameters recorded within each inflorescence

Labellum length Labellum width Spur length
(A) Dactylorhiza praetermissa (n = 35)
    Labellum width 0·773
    Spur length –0·125 –0·067
    Spur width 0·187 0·323 0·127
(B) Dactylorhiza cf. foliosa × praetermissa (n = 61)
    Labellum width 0·885
    Spur length 0·042 0·140
    Spur width 0·330 0·353 0·445
(C) Dactylorhiza fuchsii (n = 30)
    Labellum width 0·890
    Spur length 0·270 0·371
    Spur width 0·025 0·243 0·438
(D) Gymnadenia conopsea (small) (n = 9)
    Labellum width 0·870
    Spur length 0·186 0·176
    Spur width 0·930 0·909 0·127
(E) Gymnadenia conopsea (medium) (n = 15)
    Labellum width 0·918
    Spur length 0·630 0·454
    Spur width 0·454 0·490 –0·302
(F) Anacamptis pyramidalis (n = 35)
    Labellum width 0·964
    Spur length 0·870 0·887
    Spur width 0·670 0·742 0·607
(G) Platanthera chlorantha (n = 9)
    Labellum width 0·887
    Spur length 0·380 0·252
    Spur width 0·707 0·720 0·822

The correlation coefficient for labellum length versus width for Dactylorhiza viridis is 0·960 (n = 16).