Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 8;20(2):352–364. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp105

Table 2.

Young participants (ages 19–34 years); regions showing significant activation for contrasts of each prose type minus MuR

Contrast Region BA Cluster
Peak voxel
MNI coordinates (mm)
Pcorrected Extent PFDR Z x y z
NP–MuR LMTG 21 <0.001 175 0.005 5.06 −60 −36 0
LMTG 21 0.029 4.17 −60 −15 −9
LMTG 21 0.032 4.05 −60 −3 −9
RMTG 21 0.042 42 0.027 4.23 57 −18 −3
AP–MuR LIFG 47 0.065 40 0.010 3.84 −39 27 −6
LIFG 47 0.015 3.62 −48 24 −9
LIFG 44 0.003 83 0.010 3.82 −51 15 18
LIFG 45 0.025 3.35 −54 30 6
LMTG 21 <0.001 524 0.004 5.12 −63 −36 0
LMTG 21 0.004 4.99 −60 −6 −9
LMTG 21 0.005 4.55 −54 −24 −6
RMTG 21 <0.001 319 0.005 4.58 54 9 −18
RMTG 21 0.005 4.44 63 −3 0
RMTG 21 0.006 4.31 63 −9 −6
RWO–MuR LMTG 21 <0.001 324 <0.001 5.88 −56 −35 2
LMTG 21 0.001 4.86 −60 −6 −9
LMTG 21 0.001 4.80 −63 −21 −6
RMTG 21 <0.001 125 0.002 4.58 62 −15 −4
RMTG 21 0.010 3.80 48 −33 0
RMTG 21 0.019 3.52 63 −3 −9

Note: Extent, 3 × 3 × 3 mm voxels; PFDR, peak voxel statistical significance corrected for multiple comparisons using false discovery rate. Bold type: statistics for whole cluster and peak voxel. Normal type: voxel-level statistics for local maxima > 8mm apart.