Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 23;20(1):146–156. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1517-0

Table 5.

Patient-related determinants of participants’ preference for CTC or OC

  Direct post-test 5-weeks post-test
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Age ≥ 65 years 0.13 (0.02–0.97) p = 0.05 0.14 (0.02–1.18) p = 0.07 1.10 (0.45–2.73) p = 0.83 NA
Female 0.93 (0.39–2.20) p = 0.87 NA 1.28 (0.60–2.71) p = 0.53 NA
High level of education 2.34 (1.00–5.49) p = 0.05 1.92 (0.75–4.90) p = 0.17 1.48 (0.69–3.16) p = 0.32 NA
Income ≥ 27,000 euros 1.02 (0.37–2.80) p = 0.97 NA 0.93 (0.40–2.18) p = 0.87 NA
Symptoms of colorectal cancer at present 1.70 (0.70–4.10) p = 0.03 1.02 (1.00–1.04) p = 0.03 1.02 (1.00–1.04) p = 0.08 NA
Personal history of colorectal polyps 0.51 (0.22–1.21) p = 0.13 NA 0.67 (0.31–1.43) p = 0.30 NA
Personal history of colorectal cancer 0.89 (0.30–2.59) p = 0.82 NA 0.89 (0.34–2.28) p = 0.80 NA
Family history of colorectal polyps or cancer 2.52 (0.80–7.92) p = 0.11 NA 0.91 (0.40–2.06) p = 0.82 NA
Difficult or painful defecation in daily life 0.27 (0.61–1.23) p = 0.09 0.30 (0.07–1.41) p = 0.13 0.42 (0.13–1.29) p = 0.13 NA
Use of sedatives or analgesics at optical colonoscopy 1.20 (0.37–3.82) p = 0.76 NA 2.83 (0.67–8.52) p = 0.18 NA
Duration of optical colonoscopy >40 min 1.02 (0.99–1.05) p = 0.26 NA 2.42 (1.12–5.25) p = 0.03 NA
Depiction of polyps at optical colonoscopy 1.27 (0.47–3.42) p = 0.64 NA 0.91 (0.40–2.06) p = 0.82 NA
Duration of CT colonography >20 min 1.56 (0.66–3.66) p = 0.31 NA 1.58 (0.74–3.35) p = 0.24 NA
Insufflation of CO2 at CT colonography (>4 l) 1.08 (0.46–2.57) p = 0.86 NA 0.63 (0.28–1.42) p = 0.26 NA

An odds ratio less than 1 indicates a positive association with a preference for CT colonography; an odds ratio greater than 1 indicates a positive association with a preference for optical colonoscopy

NA not applicable