Table 3.
Comparison of the co-expression network and the regulatory network based on different procedures
| Procedure I | Procedure II: r2cf=0.5 | Approach II: r2cf=0.6 | Procedure II: r2cf=0.7 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantity | REG | Co-expression | REG | Co-expression | REG | Co-expression | REG | Co-expression |
| Edges | 427 | 427 | 3 (4.05) | 12 (7.47) | 1 (0.779) | 1 (2.76) | 1 (0.118) | 1 (0.564) |
| Nodes | 166 | 166 | 12 (5.15) | 12 (5.15) | 2 (2.81) | 2 (2.81) | 2 (0.781) | 2 (0.781) |
| l | 3.352 | 3.037 (0.128) | 1.333 (0.590) | 1.3 (0.558) | 1 (0.165) | 1 (0.294) | 1 (0.0798) | 1 (0.101) |
| d | 8 | 8 (1.04) | 2 (1.68) | 2 (1.53) | 1 (0.482) | 1 (0.840) | 1 (0.0879) | 1 (0.298) |
| C | 0.1270 | 0.3919 (0.0424) | 0 (0.121) | 0.571 (0.190) | 0 (0.0198) | 0 (0.385) | 0 (0.000) | 0 (0.127) |
| Max. deg. | 17 | 27 (3.05) | 2 (1.14) | 4 (1.42) | 1 (0.329) | 1 (0.993) | 1 (0.0879) | 1 (0.327) |
| lco | 160 | 117 (7.63) | 3 (3.09) | 5 (4.29) | 2 (0.519) | 2 (1.38) | 2 (0.0879) | 2 (0.346) |
| Similarity | 0.02768 (0.00505) | 0.0714 (0.0304) | 1.000 (0.233) | 1.000(0.227) | ||||
| Cutoff | 0.2004 (0.0165) | 0.50 | 0.60 | 0.70 | ||||
| ℛ | 0.0160 (0.0358) | 0.013 (0.207) | 0.262 (0.441) | 0.879(0.283) | ||||
l: average shortest path length; d: network diameter; C: mean clustering coefficient; max.deg: network maximum degree; lco; number of nodes of the network largest component; s: network similarity; ℛ: coefficient of resemblance. Numbers in the parentheses are the standard errors based on 10 000 bootstrap samples.