Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 11.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Genet. 2009 Dec;41(12):1341–1344. doi: 10.1038/ng.490

Table 1.

Characteristics of the clinical populations studied. Acute GVHD was diagnosed and graded according to standard criteria employed at the time of documented patient care. Note that the ratio of affected to unaffected individuals is not uniform across cohorts, primarily because the criteria for patient selection (which were defined prior to genetic analysis, and which for Cohorts B and C reflected the design of earlier studies) differed from institution to institution; for example, Cohort C utilized a cohort design, while Cohort B utilized a case/control design and over-sampled patients with severe acute GVHD to maximize power. Diagnostic sensitivity in the grading of GVHD can also differ between clinical institutions 33 though it is generally well-harmonized within institutions.

Cohort A (initial screen) Cohort B Cohort C
A1 A2
Hospital Helsinki University Central Hospital Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Various Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Pre-transplant conditioning Myeloablative Myeloablative Myeloablative Myeloablative
Transplant year 1993–2005 1995–2005 1985–1993 1992–2004
Donor type HLA-identical sibling HLA-identical sibling HLA-identical sibling HLA-identical sibling
Donor/recipient pairs 232 182 336 595
Graft type
 Bone marrow 77 36 336 265
 Peripheral blood stem cells 155 146 0 226
 Both 0 0 0 4
Donor/patient sex
 Female/male 50 45 74 164
 Female/female 57 46 86 115
 Male/male 66 51 90 203
 Male/female 59 40 86 113
Acute GVHD (grade II–IV)
 Yes 39 54 243 410
 No 193 128 93 180
 Not gradable 0 0 0 5
Disease
 Non-malignant disease 7 8 0 0
 Malignant hematological disease 225 174 0 595
 N/A 0 0 336 0